Yes, why not let everyone redefine marriage their own way?
The newspaper story stated: “The bride wore a long, satiny dress in peacock blue and carried a cluster of white roses.” Nadine Schweigert from Fargo ND says her wedding went so perfectly that it left her in awe.
She married herself.
The “loving couple” turned about to be the same person. Before getting married she took herself on dates "to invest in this relationship."
The 36-year-old was “married” before a crowd of 45 friends and family members. Her 11-year-old (from a previous normal marriage) didn’t want to come because “it would embarrass me.” She read her vows at the ceremony: “I, Nadine, promise to enjoy inhabiting my own life and to relish a lifelong love affair with my beautiful self.”
In a commitment ceremony she exchanged rings with her “inner groom.”
Then she did what most newlyweds do; she went on a honeymoon!
In 2010, a 30-year-old Taiwanese woman married herself.
In 2013 in Seattle, Washington, Babylonia Aivaza married a partially demolished 107-year-old abandoned warehouse! She already has a “civil union” with the building. Standing in front of the building in her wedding gown she said,"Yes, it’s a gay marriage!…I'm doing this to show the building how much I love it…"
Forget about polygamy, soon to be defined as "marriage" just like gay "marriage." At least the polygamists have children.
How about those "loving coupes" who practiced pantagamy like in Oneida NY and other locales—and perhaps elsewhere these days.
They had a form of “communal marriage” where every man or woman is regarded as one's spouse. The original 87 members grew to 172 by February 1850, 208 by 1852, and 306 by 1878. All branches were closed in 1854 except for the Wallingford branch, which operated until devastated by a tornado in 1878.
I wonder if God's devastation indicated they were sinning?
A "loving couple," Patrick Stuebing and Susan Karolewski, argued in a court case in Germany that they had rights to “marriage” —they already had four children. They were also "consenting adults”—a sister and a brother. They lost the case.
That incest case led to calls for Germany to join countries such as France, Turkey, Japan and Brazil in legalizing sex between relatives. If they are “loving couples” (as gays claim the reason for what they do is marriage) why not?
In June 2013 - Fashion designer KarlLagerfeld announced that he wished to marry his catChoupette. He said in an interview with CNN, "There is no marriage, yet, for human beings and animals… I never thought that I would fall in love like this with a cat.”
In June 2010, an 18 year old Indonesian man Ngurah Alit was forced to marry his cow because he had sex with it. He fainted at the wedding. He then became a widower when the cow was drowned in the sea to symbolically cleanse the village of the act of bestiality committed there.
In Denver a man was refused a marriage license for himself and his horse, not because it was absurd, but because his horse was underage!
is no evidence yet that zoophilia leads to sexual deviation, but that's not to say that's not the case.”
Like the children's jump-rope song:
First comes "love,"
Then comes marriage,
Then comes baby,
In a baby carriage.
Except gay marriage leaves out the last two lines. And the word “love” is changed to “lust”—and they keep up the gay propaganda to call it “marriage.”
Redefining marriage as anything else but that between a man and a woman is one big joke.Sorry for those who weren't let in on the joke.