House Forgotten

Laumeier Sculpture Park renders one artwork a "house of memories" in more than just name

If a sculpture falls at Laumeier Sculpture Park, does it make the news? Italian artist Giuliano Mauri's "La Casa della Memoria (House Remembered)," a nearly 30-foot-tall structure made of locally gathered sticks and twigs and installed in 1997, is being removed on a beautiful April morning because of safety concerns, according to Bill Briggs, head of Laumeier's grounds and maintenance. As the bulldozer shovels the sculpture's remains, the dry wood crackling in the crisp spring air, and dumps it into a waiting truck, the affable Briggs explains that part of his job is to inspect and report on the status of the Laumeier collection on a weekly basis. He began reporting his concerns about the Mauri in early '99. "Kids were on it all the time," he says, and the temporary site-specific work "started listing toward the south." He remembers that it was last October when he officially recommended the work's removal but says he doesn't know when the decision was actually made.

Briggs is squarely built, strong, offers a firm handshake and responds to questions with no hint of subterfuge. Trustworthy, capable, responsible -- if you wanted somebody to keep an eye on millions of dollars' worth of outdoor sculpture, he'd be your man.

But this is Laumeier, and the last time a sculpture was to be removed, or "deaccessioned," it was Beverly Pepper's "Cromlech Glen." That plan led to a public-relations fiasco when it became known that the artist was not in agreement with the proposed destruction of her earthwork, the grassy mound that is one of the most popular pieces in the park and of considerable importance given its place in Pepper's venerable career and in the history of environmental sculpture. "If they even think of doing something without my approval," Pepper told The Riverfront Times, "I'll give you some screaming headlines to write."

Giuliano Mauri's "La Casa della Memoria (House Remembered)": "It was removed," asserts Clara Coleman, registrar and head of collections management at Laumeier, "We didn't use a bulldozer."
Eddie Silva
Giuliano Mauri's "La Casa della Memoria (House Remembered)": "It was removed," asserts Clara Coleman, registrar and head of collections management at Laumeier, "We didn't use a bulldozer."
Giuliano Mauri's "La Casa della Memoria (House Remembered)," before the fall
Jennifer Silverberg
Giuliano Mauri's "La Casa della Memoria (House Remembered)," before the fall

"Cromlech Glen" remains as it was left last summer, its stone steps removed and stacked adjacent to its steep grass walls. A plastic fence to keep visitors off is continually torn down.

"La Casa della Memoria" is most definitely gone, however, and the efficacy of its removal raises suspicions, given the allegations of former Laumeier preparator Dennis Fortna, who worked with Mauri on the sculpture's installation. Fortna says that Laumeier director Beej Nierengarten-Smith told him, even as the piece was being built, that the work was coming down in three years but Mauri shouldn't be informed.

And here's the bulldozer, right on schedule.

"It was removed," asserts Clara Coleman, Laumeier registrar and head of collections management. "We didn't use a bulldozer."

Semantics have long been an issue at Laumeier. For example, in Laumeier's own report on its art program for 1998, under the heading "Sculpture and Arts Program: Conservation," is Meg Webster's environmental landscape installation "Pass." The "conservation" of that work was described in this fashion: "removed sculpture, including filling in ponds, tore out concrete and stone, graded the area."

When "conservation" equals "removal," who knows what a bulldozer might be?

But other than that initial confusion, Coleman is forthcoming about the reason for the deaccessioning of the Mauri. "It was removed because it was falling apart. It had been deteriorating for quite some time, and the sculpture was designed as a temporary site-specific work, expected to last about two years. We kept it about three because people really liked it. We kept it as long as we could. But we had several incidents with the piece, and it had become a safety hazard for visitors, and that's why we had to take it down."

Asked to be more specific about those "incidents," Coleman excuses herself to check the files, then calls back. First she reads from the contract with the artist: "The work will be on exhibition at Laumeier Sculpture Park as long as the condition of the sculpture continues to be suitable." Then she reads from Briggs' reports to illuminate how unsuitable the sculpture had become. April 17, 1999: Briggs and crew find the remains of a fire inside the sculpture, as well as several broken and loose poles. They report that the structure is "continuing to lean toward the southwest." July 8, 1999: Supporting poles have come loose, the upper section of the work has begun to unravel and the leaning is more severe. Aug. 20, 1999: The wood is extremely brittle, several pieces have been broken by climbers, trash and debris have been shoved between the pieces of wood, and wasps are nesting there. Finally, on Oct. 8, 1999, Briggs recommends removal. The sculpture is leaning more severely, wood is pulling loose and the structure proves unstable even when the support posts are grabbed.

Coleman says Mauri was contacted about a month ago. "He was informed initially that might happen, and my correspondence was to let him know that this decision had to be made to give him an opportunity if he wanted to make any comments about the piece." Coleman again refers to the contract and the ephemeral nature of the piece. "It was no surprise to the artist. He was probably surprised that it lasted as long as it did."

Mauri lives in Italy, speaks very little English and has no gallery representative in the United States. Coleman says Mauri "didn't have a response" to the removal of his sculpture. "We sent him information. We also contacted him because we're working on a catalog on art and nature, and 'La Casa della Memoria' is featured in the catalog. We commissioned a critical essay on the work, and we've been doing photodocumentation of the piece throughout the years. He was more interested in the catalog and the publication."

Next Page »