By Sarah Fenske
By Danny Wicentowski
By Lindsay Toler
By Danny Wicentowski
By Danny Wicentowski
By Jessica Lussenhop
By Lindsay Toler
By Lindsay Toler
Of course, they don't call it a quota; rather, they refer to it as meeting the requirements of your "performance supplement." It works like this: A medical-faculty member's minimum "base" salary next fiscal year will be 80 percent of what his or her salary was last year. To recover that missing 20 percent, the faculty member must meet certain goals. Those goals usually involve seeing more patients, performing more procedures or both, thereby producing more revenue. The chairman of each department sets the goals; the medical-school dean approves them. If those goals are not met at the end of fiscal year 2001, the faculty member takes a 20 percent income hit. The same is repeated the next year.
Predictably, more than a few physicians are pissed.
"If I don't get any of the supplement, the 20 percent, for this coming year, then next year I'm going to have another salary cut of 20 percent of the previous 80 percent," says one unhappy camper. "This means if I don't get approval by my chairman for the performance supplement, in five years my salary will be zero." OK, the math's a little off, but you get the point. And there are other concerns.
"This plan makes no reference to tenure. This is completely independent of tenure. Now it doesn't matter if we are tenured or not," the doc moans. "That destroys the principle of tenure. The idea behind tenure is to give professors freedom of expression, academic freedom, without fear of retaliation. That's lost now."
Short Cuts found that out in a hurry -- virtually no one wanted his or her name attached to comments about the new pay plan and the accompanying discontent at the medical campus on South Grand. Even sawbones who saw some good in the new pay plan didn't want to talk on the record because they were worried they'd get in trouble. So much for academic freedom.
It's no wonder there is reluctance to speak up. The chairman of internal medicine no longer heads that department, the health-science center's largest, because of his opposition to the pay plan. The director of the physicians' University Medical Group stepped down as a result of the flap. Several other chairmen are leaving, and, for a variety of reasons, some top doctors -- including two renowned cancer specialists -- have left. That the new compensation plan includes incentive bonuses for faculty physicians who really crank out the patients and procedures seems to be overshadowed by the threat of a pay cut.
Though times are tough all over for teaching hospitals -- for example, the University of Missouri-Columbia Health Sciences Center lost $17.8 million last year -- St. Louis University Health Sciences Center is in a peculiar situation because of the 1998 sale of its teaching hospital to for-profit Tenet Healthcare. For decades, SLU and its med school used the hospital's surplus to cover deficits on the North Grand main campus and in the rest of the medical campus. The sale to Tenet capped that well, however.
Thanks to St. Louis University president Lawrence Biondi, S.J., the university took in $309 million from Tenet by selling the hospital. The move was criticized by Archbishop Justin Rigali, who opposed the idea of selling the not-for-profit hospital to a for-profit chain. But Biondi and others were convinced that the hospital would eventually become a money pit. The cash from the sale was put in an endowment; critics of Biondi say he should tap that endowment to stabilize finances at the medical campus now that profits no longer flow from the hospital. The university says that's not possible, because the use of the endowment is restricted.
On the business side, critics say Tenet paid too much for the hospital. They point to the hospital's balance sheet, which shows an operating surplus before debt service from the purchase is included. Those numbers suggest that if SLU had kept the hospital, there still would have been a surplus and the need to squeeze physicians' salaries would not have arisen.
Tenet's operations in St. Louis have proved a mixed bag. At SLU Hospital, aside from having to pay off its steep purchase price, Tenet is doing well. But Tenet closed Compton Heights Hospital (the former Incarnate Word Hospital) in April and is still running deficits at Forest Park Hospital (the former Deaconess Hospital). Nationally, Tenet has had trouble with some of the hospitals the corporation has purchased, particularly eight in the Philadelphia area. Though the stock price and profits are up, a Tenet spokesman in April estimated that the company lost $100 million nationwide on physician practices. Perhaps Biondi, who serves on the Tenet board of directors, has picked up a few lessons on how to put a cap on physician costs.
Biondi, who is nicknamed "Father Capone" for his Italian and Chicago roots and for his, well, assertiveness, appears to think the medical faculty needs to pull its own weight. Not all of the faculty disagree, but the way this has been done has caused grief and some unintended defections. "The good thing is that we lost some people who weren't very productive," one professor says about some who have quit already. "The bad thing is, we're also losing good, influential people because morale is bad. People are worrying about their paychecks."
Those opposed to the new plan say the requirements don't take into consideration the complexity of procedures or their contribution to teaching and patient care. Another physician says the bottom-line focus decreases the value of lecturing and taking time to teach medical residents in a hospital-and-clinic setting.
"Docs here are working more, enjoying it less and now have the possibility of making less too," says one SLU physician. "Friends of mine throw up their hands and say, 'I'm working really hard -- it's a thankless kind of thing -- and now they're talking about cutting my salary.' They say, 'The hell with it -- I'm going to go out to West County and practice and not worry about teaching and research and administration and all this crap.'"
But there is no escape, even for doctors. These refugees from medical academia could be headed to a different, managed-care version of hell, but they appear to be willing to make the leap, fed up with seeing some of their colleagues make more money with seemingly less hassle.
Attempts to get the medical school's side of this squabble were referred to Bob Woodruff, a spokesman for Biondi from the main campus. In a written statement, Woodruff says the compensation plan has been a "collaborative effort" in the works since 1997, designed to "reward productivity."
Whether the plan is the result of a "collaborative effort" or not, there are enough angry docs who want an explanation that Biondi has agreed to meet with them next month. Chances are he won't say anything soothing or surprising. It appears the archbishop was right to oppose the hospital sale, but it appears it's not the indigent getting screwed -- yet. Who'da thunk it that the first collateral damage from the sale would be SLU physicians?
NO CREATIVE IDEA IN THIS CITY GOES UNPUNISHED: Well, at least somebody in City Hall is reading something decent. It didn't take long after Bob Cassilly let loose his stream of consciousness regarding his plans for the abandoned cement plant on Riverview Drive in North St. Louis ("There He Goes Again," RFT, Sept. 13) that City Hall decided to put a stop to it. Before that piece appeared, Cassilly resisted going on the record with his scheme, predicting that the city-code police would arrive shortly after the news broke. Bingo, Bob. It seems that in order to dump hundreds of loads of dirt, you need a permit. But Bob bears no grudge, although he compares the city inspector to Capt. Louis Renault, the Claude Rains character in Casablanca, who was shocked to find gambling going on at Rick's. Maybe Cassilly can take solace from No. 1-with-a-bullet Nelly, who was also dissed by the mayor's office (see "Radar Station," page 72). A prophet, or an artist, just ain't appreciated in his own town.