By Lindsay Toler
By Chad Garrison
By Brett Koshkin
By RFT Staff
By Lindsay Toler
By Riverfront Times
By Danny Wicentowski
By Pete Kotz
As it crawls from the wreckage of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the one faint good thing the media may escape with is an abandonment, however briefly, of the dumbed-down celebrity-consciousness of news. In our humble hamlet, our outpost on the Mississippi, this glimmer of a trend is personified by 59-year-old Harry Levins, the Post-Dispatch's senior writer, who, since 1991, has written 2,500 editions of the celebrity-riddled "People in the News" section of the paper. Since Sept. 11, that preoccupation is no more.
On the day three commercial airliners crashed into the symbols of global capitalism and the military-industrial complex, Levins came back from vacation to be the rewrite man for the lead story. He went from Angelina Jolie and Pee-wee Herman on Aug. 27 to Osama bin Laden and Donald Rumsfeld on Sept. 11. Now that it's bombs away on Afghanistan, the switch looks to be for keeps.
It wasn't until a week ago that Levins fully realized the worldview whiplash he had experienced. "I was at home at my computer. My home page is Netscape, and there's a picture of Jennifer Lopez. It says, 'J. Lo gets married,' and I say, 'Wow.' And then I thought, 'I don't give a shit,'" says Levins, laughing like a man who has just won the Missouri Lottery Pick 3. "I don't have to care anymore."
That the daily paper of record's sole "senior" writer was typing copy about the comings and goings of the Anne Heches of the world is a sad comment on what passes for journalism in this burg and elsewhere. But at least moving a reporter who pounds out a weekly "Military Matters" column, buried in Saturday's paper, to the news desk makes tactical sense. There's not much local media can do in the face of this horrific but nebulous new conflict, because it's clear that Ernie Pyle is not the prototype for the today's war correspondent. With nothing but guerilla fighting and few defined fronts, the idea of sending a local reporter anywhere seems silly.
For one, no matter how gung-ho a newshound might be, he or she wouldn't be up for a commando raid with the special forces. Pity the fool news director or editor who'd send some scoop-obsessed inquisitor to the wrong side of the Khyber Pass. Years ago, the mujahedeen took it easy on Dan Rather because they needed the publicity; this is a different deal. U.S. troops will be on foreign turf, and they'll be lucky to save their own asses, let alone some tag-along journalista.
So don't expect even a bird's-eye view of the hunt for bin Laden from local or national reporters, because when it comes to media access, chances are, this campaign will make the prepackaged, blow-dried Persian Gulf War look like a reporter's dream assignment. At least in the Persian Gulf War there was a geographic target -- the recapture of Kuwait -- and a frontline stocked with conventional troops. Still, the media was kept miles away. With this new pursuit, the only targets are moving, and there's little that's conventional about the combatants. And if another explosion or bomb goes off stateside, there may be news closer to home to cover.
The main danger early on for local media appears to be enrollment in the George M. Cohan School of Journalism, the wrapping of "Yankee Doodle Dandy" coverage in an American flag. This is not to suggest that all coverage must give "equal time to present Osama bin Laden's side," which, as KTVI (Channel 2) news director Brad Remington points out, would be ridiculous. No, strict objectivity is unachievable and unnecessary. But thorough explanation of the context of the situation, how the Taliban is the mutant child of CIA policy in Afghanistan, how bin Laden was once our compadre, how this all came to be -- that is something the local media has done poorly if at all.
Ellen Soeteber, Post-Dispatcheditor in chief, says her paper waited until the smoke cleared to start providing much analysis because right after the Oklahoma City bombing, false assumptions were made by the media. She also notes that the full-page flag that was printed in the Post-Dispatch was not part of the news hole and therefore was the publisher's call. "Initially I didn't want to do it," says Soeteber. "Then, as I kept hearing both from readers and Post-Dispatchemployees, people had such heartfelt requests on this, after a while I came around. By the time the publisher asked me on it, I had come around on my own by talking to rank-and-file employees and readers. They wanted to hang a flag in their window, and they couldn't find one anywhere else. There were some people here who disagreed with me, and that's fine. We had discussions."
One baffling promotional spot with Bob Dylan's "Blowin' in the Wind" as the musical backdrop was aired repeatedly by KSDK (Channel 5). The song has long been used as an anti-war anthem, questioning the use of violence with lyrics such as "How many deaths will it take till he knows that too many people have died?" The problem with the spot is that instead of focusing on needless death and suffering by showing the ruins of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, or destitute Afghanis headed for the border, the only visual is the American flag -- the same flag that's been attached to news logos such as "America Rising" and "America Strikes Back" or waved as part of a jingoistic call to arms.