Top

dining

Stories

 

Domino's Pizza New Oreo Dessert Pizza

$3.99
Domino's Pizza
3930 Lindell Boulevard

Why do they hate us? Intellectually flaccid. Culturally naïve. This has to be one of the more inane questions to have arisen in the frightening months after 9/11. Worse yet, the question attracted a bevy of self-serving answers.

Related Content

More About

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Dining Newsletter: The week's top local food news and events, plus interviews with chefs and restaurant owners, dining tips, and a peek at our print review.

Privacy Policy

My personal favorite: They hate us because we're free.

It was the wrong question. And anyhow, anyone who really wanted to know the "answer" needed look no further than Osama bin Laden and his 2002 "Letter to America," in which he outlined his reasons for jihad: The West's continued support of Israel, America's historic support of Middle Eastern dictators, the country's penchant for establishing military bases in Islamic states and our perceived brass-knuckled approach to the global petroleum market.

It wasn't long before this saucer-eyed, why-do-they-hate-us line of thought vanished as daisy cutters fell on Afghanistan and later Iraq. Now, a full six years after 9/11, I recently found myself reminded of those early days and, particularly, of that silly question: Why do they hate us?

You see, I think I know the answer. It's not Palestine. It's not oil. It has nothing to do with military bases in Kuwait. The House of Saud is blameless. No, it's something closer to home. It's Domino's Pizza New Oreo Dessert Pizza.

That's why they hate us.

And who could blame them? This "pizza" — a tasteless wafer really, ten-inches in diameter, slathered in "vanilla sauce" and topped with Oreo cookie shards before the whole thing is drizzled with another (un)healthy shot of "vanilla sauce" — may insult Allah, but its real sin is against the Italians.

Served hot, the thin wafer of dried leather-like crust has an inoffensive flavor. It barely registers on the tongue. I suppose that's intentional. After all, we're pretty far from Naples, birthplace of the modern pizza where by law a pizza must contain extra virgin olive oil, tomatoes and buffalo mozarella. By that measure, calling the New Oreo Dessert Pizza a "pizza" is not only illegal; it's sort of like calling a burrito a sandwich: They both have a crust, right?

Sort of. Under the same law, only crusts kneaded by hand may enter the rarefied realm of pizza crust. The crust of a Domino's Pizza New Oreo Dessert Pizza, by contrast, is more of an Oreo delivery device.

But just as a New Oreo Dessert Pizza fails as a pizza, it also fails as an Oreo cookie. You see, the crumbled Oreos atop the pie are denuded of Oreo crème. That means that whatever crème you're offered comes in the form of "vanilla sauce." There's no prying apart of wafers. There's no dunking in milk (or buffalo mozzarella, thank Allah). The ratio is all off. There's too much cookie. The crust mars the consistency, and the whole affair is sickly sweet and chewy.

If this sort of ungodly concoction isn't enough to raise international hackles, I don't know what is. Then again, there is reason to hope. Just as the Italians pulled out of Iraq in 2006, Domino's Pizza claims that the Oreo Dessert Pizza will only be available for a limited time.

Phew! At least they have an exit strategy.

Seen a foodstuff you're too timid to try? Malcolm will eat it! E-mail particulars to keepitdown@riverfronttimes.comKeep It Down!

 
  • Sam 10/02/2007 6:09:00 PM

    It's pretty easy (and in most cases free) to start your own blog. Malcolm Gay should consider doing that. When I call a plumber, I want to have my sink fixed. Not hear his views on the threat of global terrorism. When I take my son to the doctor, I want her to stop his ear infection. Not tell me why we should get our troops out of Iraq. When I read a review of a dessert pizza, I want to hear about dessert pizza. Not read an intellectually flaccid commentary on why we were attacked on 9/11 by a petulant food critic who wishes he were a noted pundit. "Why do they hate us?" may or may not be an inane question, but one thing is certain: If the world really wants to find the answer, it won't turn to Riverfront Times Food Critic Malcolm Gay for help.

  • Mik 09/30/2007 12:28:00 AM

    Wannabe Pundit!!

  • Sol Impugn 09/29/2007 1:19:00 AM

    "Malcolm will eat it!", eh? How about this, for starters: My shorts! They need to send you back to the mail room or, at least, put you back on obit duty. Exactly what does the first 2/3rds of this article have to do with the food being reviewed? Forget about the fact that American freedom isn't ONLY the REASON we were attacked. It is also the thing that left us wide open for attack. Freedom is the basis for our culture (F "multi-cultural" BS) as Americans. It is the one thing more powerful on a global scale than our military. It is what tweaks those fundamentalist Islamic types to no end - watching their youth be influenced by little things like free political thought, respect for women, value of the common man, sexual liberation...oh, yeah...and the nonsense stuff, too, like music, fashion, and other forms of entertainment. It is not a coincidence that the fascist types (like the terrorist jackasses) would categorically deny each of the rights guaranteed in the first ten amendments of The Constitution. Freedom, sadly enough, will ultimately be the M.O. when we get attacked again. Left to mental midgets such as yourself, this will be sooner rather than later. "Now, a full six years after 9/11," we still have yet to see another domestic terrorist attack. No thanks to you and your kind. Now stick to evaluating edible and semi-edible items. Too bad you weren't given the "Windows on the World" breakfast buffet review assignment "a full six years" ago.

  • CB_Brooklyn 09/19/2007 11:46:00 PM

    Dr Morgan Reynolds, the former Chief Economist of the US Dept of Labor, is suing private contractors alleging they defrauded the government by supplying bogus analyses for the official 9/11 NIST Report of an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone gliding into a steel/concrete building. Dr Reynolds is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart, and is demanding a Trial By Jury. The US District Court, Southern New York, recently unsealed the case and Mr Leaphart is now notifying the Defendants. See Dr Reynolds site for info and the Court Document PDF: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case Dr Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University, recently filed an appeal with the government for their refusal to retract their report on the World Trade Center destruction. Dr Wood (and Dr Reynolds) have compiled much evidence demonstrating that the WTC was destroyed with directed energy weapons. She has been in contact with government officials and is getting results. See Dr Wood's site for evidence of directed energy weapons and PDFs of official Request for Corrections filed with the government: http://drjudywood.com Dr Wood is also represented by Jerry Leaphart. It's every American's duty to remove corrupt elements in the government. Please help by distributing the above material to your local media.

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy