The Holy Land Foundation was once the largest Islamic charity in America — until it was caught violating U.S. law by funneling $12 million to Hamas. Five members of the foundation were handed life sentences in 2009 for the crime.

As part of that investigation, the feds found a memo at Holy Land's suburban Dallas headquarters. It was written in 1991 by a Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas member named Mohamed Akram. The text lays out a comical plot to institute religious Sharia law across America by using "our organizations and the organizations of our friends," MSAs included.

Never mind that in a largely Christian nation, there's zero chance that Sharia law will ever come to rule the land, given its Dark Ages approach to basic rights. Horowitz nonetheless insists that Muslim student associations take their marching orders from the memo.

David Horowitz rants at the 2011 conservative gathering CPAC,
Mark Taylor
David Horowitz rants at the 2011 conservative gathering CPAC,
The Horowitz Freedom Center "Where Are They Now?" ad that ran in campus newspapers including the January 23, 2012, edition of The Lantern at Ohio State University.
The Horowitz Freedom Center "Where Are They Now?" ad that ran in campus newspapers including the January 23, 2012, edition of The Lantern at Ohio State University.

"I see it as a recruitment organization," he says. "Its purpose is first to isolate the Muslim students, to create a Muslim center so they're not going to assimilate into Western values. I know this from my youth in Communist front associations. The idea is you create a group that gathers all the Muslim kids, and then you identify the ones who become leaders. Those are the ones who get positions of power in the organization, and those are the ones who go on to do other Muslim Brotherhood tasks."

Yet there's little evidence that the memo was ever put into play outside of the overactive imagination of its author.

"It's one memo that they found that some crazy guy had written that was never in any way accepted by anyone or implemented anywhere, even by the Muslim Brotherhood," says Haris Tarin, director of the Washington, D.C., office of the Muslim Public Affairs Council. "The idea of American Muslims on college campuses who've never been to places like Egypt having some affinity to the Muslim Brotherhood is absurd."

Still, Sharia law has become a bogeyman for even seemingly sensible conservatives. Two years ago, Oklahoma passed a constitutional amendment — with 70 percent of the vote — banning its use in state courts. For Horowitz, it's a topic that reliably kicks up dust at colleges.

Last January, the Ohio State University student paper ran the same "Where Are They Now?" ad that appeared at Florida State. The Lantern's staff was pummeled with e-mails and calls from students. Horowitz chimed in from the sidelines, clearly enjoying the furor.

Freedom Center ads are almost a yearly rite at UCLA, where the Daily Bruin regularly receives alternating waves of attacks and counterattacks. One side clamors for a muzzle, the other wants Horowitz to have his say.

"At MSA, we've met with the communications department and made it clear we don't want David Horowitz's ad published," says Haidar Anwar, a UCLA student who serves as president of MSA West, an umbrella group. "We've brought it up to the dean of students as well. But after we met with them, David Horowitz published another ad."


Muslim Hate: A Cottage Industry
If your business involves pissing people off, it's important to have steady reports of success from the battlefront. Each new episode of tumult adds a fresh coat of paint to your image as an effective instigator. That's what funders want to see.

From 2001 to 2009, groups like Horowitz's received $42 million in donations — mostly from large conservative charities, according to the Center for American Progress. All that money provides incentive to sharpen one's attacks.

"These people are very deliberate in how they do things," says Tarin. "Some of them focus on college campuses. Some of them focus on law enforcement. Some of them focus on churches and Rotary clubs and senior-citizen homes. It's an industry."

Horowitz swats down any talk about his role in spreading Islamophobia. Because his work is mainly focused on campuses, he can wrap himself snugly in the First Amendment and claim he's just offering up another academic perspective. "If you use the words 'Muslim' and 'terrorist' in a sentence or a paragraph, you're an Islamophobe," he says. "That's just an attempt to silence critics, which is what I am. I am not a person who is hostile to Muslims."

But when you start retailing these ideas outside that campus bubble, the chances increase that you'll not only reach a touchy college liberal, but also that panhandle craziness the FBI feared at Florida State. And Horowitz still has an active hand in such wider messaging. Two high-profile names sharing his brain waves and support are Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.

As the guy behind Jihad Watch, Spencer is on the Freedom Center payroll. Geller runs a blog called Atlas Shrugs and was a recipient of a Freedom Center award for courage. Together they founded Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA). Both are full-throttled in their excoriation of all things Muslim — so much so that the SIOA has landed on the Southern Poverty Law Center's list of hate groups, along with the Ku Klux Klan and the Aryan Brotherhood.

"I think Horowitz is just coming up to the line of Islamophobia and not stepping over it," says Heidi Beirich, director of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project. "But he's perfectly happy to fund it."

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
1 comments
bercreaup
bercreaup like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

I picked this story up off the rack because the subtitle caught my eye: "sometimes he's actually right"?  I was genuinely curious to see what you would say, but for pages I got nothing but discussion about how Horowitz is a nutty radical. No news there. 

Then, you finally get around to what seems like it's the point: "But sometimes Horowitz does more than burnish a nugget of truth into a rockslide of indignation. Sometimes — as in the case of Florida State —he's actually right." Ok, now we're getting somewhere. I'm curious to see how you argue he doesn't just cherry-pick facts and blow them out of proportion, but is actually right about some things.

Instead we get a highly selective list of the few MSA members among thousands that have become terrorists. Wait--I think to myself--he's still cherry-picking; you can't construe this as evidence that all Muslim interest groups are bad. Fortunately, you end this section by acknowledging exactly this point: "In short: Broad-brushing the entire group is akin to labeling all evangelical Christians as freaks on parwith the Westboro Baptist Church. But Horowitz and his followers are willing to sew these instances into a distinctive pattern. Because that's just good business for David Horowitz." In other words, toparaphrase you by quoting you: he "burnish[ed] a nugget of truth into a rockslide of indignation." 

Oh, and none of the nuggets of truth have anything to do with Florida State.The rest of the article continues to observe that Horowitz is a nutty radical, which, again, is not news.

You're a hack.

 
Loading...