People swirl around the cases, their faces alive with desire. I manage to piece together from the booming PA that there's a raffle happening. Tickets cost $20; when 100 are sold, the owner of the winning ticket gets to pick a weapon from the Not-a-Wall of Guns.

"You just hand them out to the winners?" I ask the man selling tickets. "There's no checking?" Checking for what, I'm not sure; it just seems like there should be checking involved.

His eyes go wide.

"Oh no, no, of course we don't."

He describes the process, which basically involves the gun of your choice being sent to your local gun retailer for you to pick up. I imagine what this process would look like back home, should some budding entrepreneur decide to register GunLottery.co.uk. Even the right-wing press would denounce him as dangerous. He'd be living on the streets within days.

"So you're selling these guns for $2,000, essentially," I tell the ticket man, and he laughs. This place is a real money spinner. There's a wheel of fortune, the winner of which takes home a really big knife. And the raffle lasts all weekend. They've already given away 50 or 60 guns, he says.

"How many do you think you'll sell?" I ask.

"Depends on how many tickets we sell. Want to buy a ticket?"

I don't.

"Can you just straight out buy a gun from the wall?" I ask him.

"Well, if you've got $2,000."section break

The press room is tucked into the upper corner of the convention center, a sterile gray room with neon lighting and three flat-screens. There are good points and bad points.

Good point: It's got free cookies. Bad point: It's otherwise no different from the convention floor.

I thought it might be a quiet place to jot down some totally nonjudgmental observations about Sarah Palin's shouting, but there she is on all the TVs, prattling on in Alaskan about her hunting prowess. I briefly consider switching the channel to football, but something about the scene — the press Wi-Fi password is "standandfight," and my fellow media members are largely from outlets like blackmanwithagun.com or the Philadelphia Gun Blog — tells me there probably aren't a lot of Watford FC fans here.

I flee, cookie in hand, under the watchful gaze of a man in a black T-shirt that says "SECOND AMENDMENT: AMERICA'S ORIGINAL HOME SECURITY." I go back down the escalator and get my first glimpse of the conference hall. I pause a moment to take it in and to finish my cookie. That's when it hits me: I should have taken two.

It also hits me that this place is gigantic. You have to admire the architect who decided that Houston needed something bigger than the starship Enterprise for convention-holding. It feels like the far ends of the hall are shrouded in mist, and that I must trek through the night to make it to whatever brushed-steel obscurities it holds.

The center is rammed to capacity, like Cardiff City Centre on a Friday night but with way more guns and way less beer. I let the tide carry me out into the sea of cloaked armament. There are no metal detectors, and it's kind of assumed that most everyone has a gun. I'm not sure if that makes me feel more or less safe, but I certainly can't get it out of my mind. I brush past a guy in combat shorts and feel his handgun brush against my leg. I briefly long for the Tube at rush hour, where the things that brush against you only leave a rash.

There are guns everywhere, of course, but it's more a shrine to general survival implements: handguns, rifles, assault weapons, silencers, scopes, entire stalls of antique coins for some reason, clothing, endless ways to conceal a weapon, knives, throwing stars, stuffed animals, targets, holiday packages, humongous gun safes that you could live inside if you were small and resourceful, and, my favorite stall, the one I'm looking at now.

It's called Zombie Industries. It's a large corner stand with variously attired but universally bloodied zombie torsos, displayed prominently above the polo-shirted workers below. The "director of sales," Nicholas Iannitti, flits around underneath, happily talking about his creations, which retail for around $100 apiece. They're targets to use on a range; that much is obvious. What makes them special is that they bleed when you shoot them.

"Our best seller is Chris," Iannitti says, pointing toward a gray-hued zombie high on the wall.

"Any idea why?"

"None at all," Iannitti says. "We're equally proud of all our creations."

The other zombies are either green-skinned or silly caricatures, like the zombie with a Bin Laden beard and a turban simply called "Terrorist" or a garish clown with an evil grimace.

"Why do they all bleed red?" In all the films and computer games I've seen, zombies bleed black or green.

"We tried out a lot of colors — yellow, green, black — and in the end red was just the easiest to see down range."

"Anyway," Iannitti adds brusquely, as he considers more deeply why someone with such a silly accent is asking such silly questions. "How do any of us know what color a zombie's meant to bleed? I certainly don't."

« Previous Page
 |
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
31 comments
Serpa
Serpa

Do anti-gun people such as the author revel in their cultural and technological ignorance of guns? Because it certainly seems they do.

rmp2011
rmp2011

a/ Gun crime has SOARED in the U.K since the banning you are so proud of.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-154307/Gun-crime-soars-35.html

b/ We don't want your anti-Constitution kind here. Tell your wife to divorce you and send you home to your fantasy-land where you prefer rubbing up against men in "the tube", or just both of you get out.

c/ While you are still here, why don't you go visit Mexico (since you love THEIR culture so much more than ours) and see how SEVENTY THOUSAND PEOPLE have been killed by the Cartels, most of them because their government DISARMS the majority of the population and/or will not allow them the level of self-defense weaponry that the Cartels are buying from the corrupt mexican military, or that they are having hand-delivered by ERIC HOLDER AND OBAMA.

d/ Until you get on the plane back to Londonistan, you need to print out these bumper stickers and use them appropriately:

Put this bumper sticker on your car:

http://i.imgur.com/lxPoG.gif

And put this flyer on the front door of your home and at your place of work:

http://i.imgur.com/xneXT.gif

And be sure to put this sign on the front door of your kid's school:

http://i.imgur.com/4THIk.jpg

jack.foobar.42
jack.foobar.42

I guess she doesn't want to join the British grooming gangs.  How insensitive of her.

bbhnkr
bbhnkr

"The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed - where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once."

Judge Alex Kozinski

ARlove
ARlove

 There are well over 300 million guns in America and an estimated 80 million gun owners. The Liberal-Communists are delusional to think that all free men and women will just hand over their weapons .... some will, but most will not. History readily shows us that unarmed citizens soon lose their natural rights and become powerless against an oppressive government which then begins killing its dissenting, unarmed citizens. The preceding is factual and the details of these events, unlike earlier times in history, are readily available to people who care enough to look. Millions have begun "Prepping" and have gathered weapons, ammunition and supplies in unprecedented amounts in preparation for what they feel is inevitable. Our Communist infiltrated government, which has been actively dismantling our Constitution and eliminating our God-given freedoms, is also prepping for the fight that they will soon be facing, albeit their numbers are much, much smaller. Freedom runs deep in the veins of most Americans and they will not disarm. Defections from the Government's forces will run rampant as they have already begun to understand the inherently evil ideology that they would support. They will soon come to realize that they will be facing friends and family that will fight to their deaths to be free. America is waking up! God help us all.

AmericanMom
AmericanMom

Having been stationed in the U.K. and originally from California,  this opinion is familiar ground. Fear drives many of our base emotions whether dealing with firearms, spiders or other imagined dangers we expect to leap out of the darkness.   

The Author states:

"But despite all these clearly necessary precautions for displaying a semiautomatic rifle in a place containing tens of thousands of people, my palms are slick with anxiety. I need to leave. Now."

...and so perhaps he should have. Culturally speaking the underexposure of dealing with firearms has created a phobia in many geographic locations. That is perfectly understandable. 


In all honesty, Mr. Cleaver did not "travel to the heart of gun culture" - he went to a National sales pitch. What did he expect? 

One doesn't travel to a Convention to learn about rifles or the "gun culture" - it is a daily journey that should be experienced with those that exercise the care and due diligence we have been afforded by our Constitution. 

I encourage all readers to take the opportunity to consider - is Mr. Cleaver afraid or is he attempting to create fear?



wonderdude
wonderdude

Boy, if we could only blame the British for our unenlightened governmental system and culture!

smdrpepper
smdrpepper topcommenter

This is a great article, showing another perspective on this issue.  I own guns myself, but I know we need to put the "well regulated" back into the second amendment.  It IS way too easy to get guns and there are people who should never have them.  We may not need to go to extremes like they have in the UK, but we can definitely take some pages from their playbook, as well as the rest of the industrialized world.  

Something needs to happen because we are rapidly becoming as bad as a third world nation.  And there are elements in this nation, including the NRA, that would be all about having another revolution.

They love to say, we need our guns to protect ourselves from the government, but never once do they actually notice that the government has the military.  And last I checked, your AR 15 has no chance against a tank or a jet.  IF the government was going to come after you, which all signs point to that never happening, they have much more resources than you.

angela52376
angela52376

I like the idea that this piece is written by someone that's not from this country and viewing it from a different perspective.  He comes from a place where people aren't screaming that they need firearms to be "free" or spreading the idea that there's this big bad government out there that wants to somehow "imprison" them so they must arm themselves against it.  The whole idea of this and the attitudes he came across were completely alien to him.  He lived up until recently in a country that DOES have extremely strict gun control yet he was able to enjoy as free of a life there as any here in the U.S. with no danger of being put in "concentration camps" or anything of that nature that the fear mongers against any sort of gun control here try to lead people to believe will happen if any gun control legislation is ever passed (and nothing that has ever been proposed is anywhere near as stringent as regulations in the UK).  Gun crime is almost non-existant where he is from.  He can walk the streets or go to a movie and his children to school with extremely little fear of some crazy with a gun coming in and taking out 20+ people in a matter of seconds to minutes.   It is ironic that the reason that so many people in this country feel that they need to own a gun for protection is precisely because so many people have guns.  On a side note, what he related about the NRA member harassing the woman reading the names is one of my biggest problems with the NRA and people with a militant pro-firearms mindset.  Instead of acknowledging that there are innocent people that have been killed by guns, through accidents, crime and suicide, and respecting those victims and their grieving loved ones, they make it about them and their guns over the human being.   If these people would respectfully acknowledge that guns do lead to the loss of innocent lives and show some remorse about that and respect for those innocents that have died by them, perhaps more people would be open to listening to and considering their viewpoint that though they have a negative side, guns do have their positive uses and place in society and it would also help if they seemed more outspoken about gun safety and keeping them out of the hands of children, the mentally ill, and criminals....but the vast majority of their attention seems to be focused solely on yelling as loud as they can that no one will take their guns away, regardless of the fact that zero legislation has ever been put before congress that would do any such thing to law abiding citizens.  Even the past assault weapons ban that was allowed to expire and the one recently put before congress was not retroactive, meaning only that no more could be sold.  Those that already owned them could keep them.  

JamesMadison
JamesMadison topcommenter

Ignorant journalists do not help educate the public, especially ones that readily admit their own ignorance.

Gavin, you held a rifle, not a gun. Learn what words mean before using them. Some will claim rifles are a subcategory of guns, but they are weak-minded, too. There are shotGUNS and handGUNS, but you held a barrel with RIFLING.

You also did something really stupid. You handle a weapon without any knowledge how to do so. You should have asked the experts what to do. But you did not dare show your ignorance to those people, right? Well, you did by putting your finger on the trigger. You fooled no one but yourself.

Next time, when you are surrounded by more knowledgeable people, ask them for information before reporting on your stupidity.

drgb
drgb

@AmericanMom I clicked on the "Like" button for your post and it registered "Unlike" and won't register a "Like" so I'm  doing the long way.  Well said!

juandos
juandos

@smdrpepper "<i>Something needs to happen because we are rapidly becoming as bad as a third world nation</i>"...

You have <b>NO</b> idea what you're talking about - not even the remotest clue...

You want to take that '<i>well regulated</i>' somewhere, take it to the hood and see how it plays there...

"<i>They love to say, we need our guns to protect ourselves from the government, but never once do they actually notice that the government has the military</i>"...

So you automatically assume that the vast majority of volunteer armed forces will turn their guns on the citizens just because they are so ordered?

Amazing...

"<i>And last I checked, your AR 15 has no chance against a tank or a jet</i>"...

Apparently you've never been to a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JA8I5ADd4Mk"><b>Big Sandy Shoot</b></a>...

:<i>IF the government was going to come after you, which all signs point to that never happening, they have much more resources than you</i>"...

Never?!?! Maybe and then again maybe not...



JamesMadison
JamesMadison topcommenter

@smdrpepper , the military may have more guns than I do, but they do not have more guns than We, the people, have. Also, the members of the military are citizens as well. They are sworn to not follow unlawful orders. Our military cannot operate as a whole against the people. Look at what what happened when one man stood against a tank in Tienanmen Square. Soldiers are not robots blindly following orders. Some will, but the vast majority will not.I do not fear the majority of the military. I fear a few with high power stealing our personal liberties, seeking our phone records, and stuff like that.

I also know the police cannot stop a criminal. They may be able to eventually catch up and arrest him, but I take personal responsibility for my safety.

angela52376
angela52376

@smdrpepper Exactly.  I am a gun owner myself but I am not one of these raving fanatics and I am realistic (and sane) enough to see that there are cons along with the pros of firearms.  Owning a firearm is a very serious responsibility and I don't think enough people take that responsibility seriously enough based on the number of accidental deaths, firearms being allowed to fall into the wrong hands be that stolen by a criminal because they weren't locked up properly or a mentally ill friend or family member getting ahold of them for the same reason, etc.  Guns are tools for a purpose and to glorify them and basically worship them the way some people do is ludicrous.  To go around talking about them in such a way that it gives the impression that owning one puts some sort of magical "bubble of protection" around you is also ludicrous.  The reason that some people are totally against any firearms and/or fear them is precisely because of the crackpot things that many gun owners say and believe.  If they acted more sane and grounded in reality and as I said in another post acknowledged the cons to guns and the fact that innocent people ARE killed by them (thousands every year in this country) and showed some remorse and more interest in promoting responsible gun ownership and safety over just screaming about people trying to take their guns all the time, people might not be so against them or anti-gun.

drgb
drgb

@angela52376 You fail to mention the fact that, although Great Britain may have fewer crimes involving the use of guns, their violent crime rate per capita surpasses that of the U.S.  In G.B. they use use knives, clubs, fists, feet, etc. and manage to accomplish what they did before their gun ban, perhaps less humanely.  Secondly, the purpose of the Second Amendment is protection from tyranny, be it from outside invasion or arising from within our borders.  All one needs to do is look back in history at countries that have had the most vile of dictatorships (U.S.S.R., China, Cambodia, Germany, Cuba, etc., etc.) and recognize the pattern of gun registration followed by confiscation.  You say our U.S. gov't. would never turn on us?  You're right.  It won't.  As long as the Second Amendment is respected. 

chris19832009
chris19832009

@JamesMadison Thought you might find this helpful.

gun1  [guhn]  Show IPA noun, verb, gunned, gun·ning.noun1.a weapon consisting of a metal tube, with mechanical attachments, from which projectiles are shotby the force of an explosive; a piece of ordnance.2.any portable firearm, as a rifle, shotgun, or revolver.3.a long-barreled cannon having a relatively flat trajectory.4.any device for shooting something under pressure: a paint gun; a staple gun.

angela52376
angela52376

@JamesMadison  Yet somehow he miraculously managed to survive this long without knowing how to use one or owning one.  Hmmmm........

angela52376
angela52376

@drgb @angela52376   Come on drgb....you seriously believe that a bunch of citizens even if they were all armed with AR-15's woud be able to combat the numbers, technology, and weaponry of the U.S. military....or any other industrialized country's military for that matter....those days are long over.  Other countries including the UK have gun registration and the like and did NOT turn into dictatorships.  The reasons for those dictatorships came about for a variety of reasons unrelated to firearms and most likely the proliferation of firearms in the country would not have stopped it from happening, in some cases it might have actually make it easier in some countries for people like that to take power depending on what their support is in the general population which is usually based on the problems the country is facing and the desperation of its people.  But really the point is, with the amount of money we spend in just a single MONTH on our military, there is very little chance that the citizens of this country could any longer stop any inside or outside "tyranny."  I know it's fun to fantasize about being some sort of "freedom fighter" but it's just not reality anymore.  Once the days of single shot muzzle loading rifles being the best that anyone had, military or non-military, those days pretty much came to an end.  As far as "violent crime in the UK" goes, jrm9584 has very accurately stated the issue with comparing our stats to theirs.  Clubs, hammers, knives, etc can of course inflict serious injury or death on a person or even a few people, but you can't take out the number of people in the very short amount of time that you can with a firearm....and also do it from a distance which is not something you can do with those other weapons.    

jrm9564
jrm9564

@drgb @angela52376http://blog.skepticallibertarian.com/2013/01/12/fact-checking-ben-swann-is-the-uk-really-5-times-more-violent-than-the-us/


"the definitions for “violent crime” are very different in the US and Britain, and the methodologies of the two statistics he cites are also different... theFBI’s Uniform Crime Reports defines a “violent crime”as one of four specific offenses: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.

The British Home Office, by contrast, has a substantially different definition of violent crime. The British definition includes all “crimes against the person,” including simple assaults, all robberies, and all “sexual offenses,” as opposed to the FBI, which only counts aggravated assaults and “forcible rapes.

When you look at how this changes the meaning of “violent crime,” it becomes clear how misleading it is to compare rates of violent crime in the US and the UK. You’re simply comparing two different sets of crimes."

sfc415
sfc415

@drgb You're right, it's the pop gun in your closet that's keeping you safe from a nuclear-armed, drone-having, stealth bomber-owning military! 

JamesMadison
JamesMadison topcommenter

@chris19832009 , ask anyone who takes shooting serious (as all who shoot ought to do). You'll get that rifles are rifles, and guns are guns. Misuse words often enough, and their meanings will change. Marriage is under a transformation. Is a bike a foot powered device? Or is a bike a chopper? See? Words misused blur their meanings, as do a bunch of illiterate journalists calling a rifle a gun. Find a US Marine to define the precise meaning of these words.

JamesMadison
JamesMadison topcommenter

@angela52376, hmmm... indeed. I've managed to go this long without the use of a cellphone. What difference does that make? I would not write an article on owning cellphone.  This author is ignorant of weapons, yet he has no issue writing about them. Curiousier and curiousier.

ARlove
ARlove

@smdrpepper @drgb @angela52376  Pepper, the reason why cops use hollow points is because they are more disabling and kill efficient. If they really cared about over-penetration they'd be using frangible bullets. FEMA camps exist, do your own research. There is ample evidence available proving so. Watch Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory episode that he did on the FEMA camps and see how the govt. lies and covers up. You're a Top Commenter? .... Really! You're the best that Missouri has to offer? Fool.

smdrpepper
smdrpepper topcommenter

@drgb @angela52376 Hollowpoint bullets are the preferred bullet for any law agency since when fired, do not generally pass through the body to hit someone else.  Thats common sense.  As for the rest, its just pure paranoia, and has no basis in reality.  FEMA camps, really?  Yeah, your a right winger all right since these are their usual talking points.

drgb
drgb

@angela52376 @drgb I'll be only too happy to respond to your posts. I hardly know where to begin, but let's start out simply. You make the assumption I'm "right wing" and go on to accuse me (by association) of making up a claim, making up evidence in support, claim "actual" evidence is essentially faulty, use fabricated evidence to prove it, and "claim victory". Did you actually read my response? Can you point out even ONE example where I've used the tactics you've described? My initial reply to your post referred to a comparison of violent crime in the U.K. and U.S.  Unlike your friend jrm9584, who attempted to mislead everyone by omitting the info that would prove my point, I quoted the remainder of the article he cited (see my response to his post). I won't rehash my rebuttal as you can read it above.   The remainder of my reply to you related to the relevance of the Second Amendment. In your "more than two decades of historical research into this country's history", you surely must be aware of the importance of this God-given right. If you think it isn't relevant to today's world, state your evidence. And if you don't think we should fear our gov't. please explain the need for Dept. of Homeland Security to purchase 1.6 BILLION rounds of HOLLOW-POINT bullets. While you're at it, tell us why there are hundreds of FEMA camps scattered around the U.S. capable of imprisoning millions. I search out and deal with truth, whatever the source. I know more than what the mainstream media reports. If the MSM's your only source for news, don't waste my time.   

angela52376
angela52376

@drgb @angela52376 Ah....of course you don't have "time" right now....you don't have time to back up your assertions and accusations however you have time to reply saying that you don't have time.  Cop out.  No, it wouldn't matter where I learned what I know, what primary source documents I've studied getting my degree or during my more than two decades of historical research into this country's history because you would say it's inaccurate no matter what simply because it does not agree with what you want to be true.  Here is the Right Wing Scientific Method:  1.  Make up claim  2.  Make up evidence to support claim.  3.  Claim all actual evidence is wrong/liberally biased/deliberately fabricated through some conspiracy 4.  Use made up evidence to prove it.  5.  Claim victory  

Please....if you have the time to accuse someone of being misinformed or ignorant or stupid then you have the time to present your evidence to prove such claims.  If you don't have the time to do that, then don't bother to post and attempt that sorry cop out.  

drgb
drgb

@angela52376 @drgb Sorry I don't have time right now to reply to all the assumptions/inaccuracies/lack of knowledge & history contained in your posts.  I may do so at a future time if you insist.  In the meantime, why don't you bone up on world & U.S. history from a source other than what you've read.  Does the mind good. 

drgb
drgb

@jrm9564 @drgb @angela52376 Found the article from which you're quoting.  The portion you quote seems to support a position implying that England and Wales are less violent or at least no more violent than the U.S.  Reading further, however, the author admits that in his "best estimate" the U.K. rate would be adjusted downward from 1,797/100,000 to 776/100,000 using the stated criteria.  That's still nearly twice the rate of 403/100,000 in the U.S.  (Nice try. You only committed the offense of lying by omission, which on this forum won't get you any jail time but should put a dent in your credibility).  I've tried to confine my position to the necessity of honoring the Second Amendment and the intent of the founders. That's not to diminish the inherent, God-given right of each individual to self-defense. Think about it. Your residence is being broken into at 3:00 a.m.  You're going to do one of four things:  1) Get your gun.  2) Wish you had a gun.  3) Call someone with a gun (the cops).  4) Become a victim.  Fortunately, in this country, you still have a choice.  If you choose # 3 or 4 I wouldn't want to be your spouse/child/fellow occupant.  

drgb
drgb

@sfc415 @drgb So then, are you implying that Americans should give up their right to arm themselves and feel just as safe as a result?  Perhaps you should confer with those who've lived in countries where gun confiscation has occurred.  People have a tendency to disregard laws that have no "teeth", no punishment for violation.  The "teeth" in our Bill of Rights is the Second Amendment.  Without it, the remainder are just words on paper to those who would like to take control over the masses.  It's hard to believe how many responders to my previous comment above are ignorant of history.  If politicians are among the least trustworthy of all occupations, why would you entrust them with something as precious as your liberty? A couple of noteworthy quotes:  1) "A nation that expects to be ignorant and free, expects what never was and never will be". -- T. Jefferson    2) "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote". 

JamesMadison
JamesMadison topcommenter

@angela52376, the point I got from the article was that someone without any understanding of firearms went to play around with firearms to write an article about their experience from a complete ignorant standpoint. Perhaps you found deeper meaning in the uninformed article. I did not.

So, Great Britain has no murders, no rapes, no crime, simply because thy passed a law saying the common man must flee a crime rather than defend himself? Really?  The recent hacking with an axe shows that the unarmed person is at danger to criminals.

Your overused "fact" is flawed. Yes, people with firearms unfortunately too often injure themselves or loved ones. But not more than they defend themselves. You do not need a dead body to make using a firearm a useful choice in defense. How many unreported times as a criminal fled without a shot being fired? When criminals know you are armed and willing to defend yourself, they mostly run like little scared nothings.

We agree that too many accidents happen with firearms. Too many accidents happen with motorcycles and cars. Too many accidents happen with swimming pools. Accidents are what they are. More responsibility is needed for each, including firearm safety.

I do not glorify guns. I respect the rights of my fellow citizens to defend themselves in any legal  manner they choose. Fortunately, the Second Amendment prevents our government from taking our ability to defend ourselves.

If you want stats, more unarmed people die waiting on the police to arrive. Stats can be used and misused.


angela52376
angela52376

@JamesMadison @angela52376  Yeah that was kind of the point to show that someone that has not lived in our society where ironically enough so many people feel the need to have a gun for protection precisely because so many people have guns sees the attitudes and mindsets here as so alien.  The far right in this country often try to make it sound like people can't possibly survive without one but the statistics actually show that you're more likely to be harmed by your own gun than you are to save yourself or anyone else with it.  Listen, I'm not against responsible gun ownership and we own a couple ourselves, BUT I also don't buy into the fear mongering gun fanaticism that so many in this country preach.  I also don't glorify guns as so many do.  They are simply tools for a purpose and owning one is a very serious responsibility that I'm afraid based on the numbers of accidental deaths, the number of firearms stolen and then falling into the hands of criminals every year, etc that not enough people that own them take that responsibility seriously enough.


 
Loading...