Katz filed her lawsuit a year after resigning her position, in 2009. The brewery almost immediately sought to get it dismissed from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. When Judge Mark H. Neill denied that motion, and denied the brewery's request to force Katz into arbitration proceedings, A-B appealed.
But in an opinion issued this morning
, the appeals court sided with Katz, finding that Judge Neill acted in appropriately in refusing to dismiss the gender-discrimination lawsuit.
Katz worked for the St. Louis-based brewery from 1988 to 2008, resigning soon after Belgian conglomerate In-Bev purchased the company. She had risen to become vice president of corporate communications and consumer affairs.
But Katz alleged that she was paid less than her male counterparts
. She also alleged that Anheuser-Busch encouraged a "locker room" mentality that gave women little opportunity for advancement.
According to a Post-Dispatch
write-up of Katz's suit at the time of its filing:
Katz claimed she was given a smaller salary and
bonuses than male executives despite repeatedly raising concerns
between 2002 and 2007 about the disparity to former A-B Chief
Executive Patrick Stokes, former Chairman August Busch III, former
CEO August Busch IV and current A-B President David Peacock.
The lawsuit alleges that when Katz was promoted
in July 2002, she received all the same duties formerly assigned to
John Jacob, A-B's retiring executive vice
president and chief communications officer. But she did not receive
the administrative assistant, office suite with a conference room
or the same salary, the suit alleges.
The suit said Jacob was paid a base salary of
$605,000 and a bonus of $645,000 ($1.25 million total) in 2001, his
last year at A-B. By contrast, Katz received
$300,000 in base salary and a bonus of $200,000 ($500,000 total) in
2002, her first year in the new position... [B]y
2007, she still made only 46 percent of what Jacob had earned in
2001, according to the suit.
Today's opinion, decided unanimously by the three-judge panel at the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District, doesn't address the merit of Katz's claims -- only the company's attempts to force her into its arbitration process.
Katz had signed and entered into a "mutual agreement to arbitrate claims" with A-B in 2000, according to today's opinion. But Circuit Court Judge Neill had found that, when InBev acquired the brewery, the agreement terminated and was no longer valid
In its opinion today, the appellate court agreed. The appellate justices also found that it was too late for A-B to raise other claims that would force Katz into arbitration.
The case has been sent back to circuit court, where Katz will be able to continue to push her claims of discrimination.
Francine Katz, who served as a vice president at Anheuser-Busch before resigning her position and filing a lawsuit alleging the company encouraged a "frat party" atmosphere and discriminated against female employees, has beat the brewery in appellate court.