Republican State Senator Brian Nieves doesn't shirk from hitting below-the-belt. The pro-gun politician's latest opponent, however, is the National Rifle Association.
"The NRA is using the same inappropriate, dishonest, and disgusting tactics we only expect from the left!!" he wrote in a Feburary 15 post on his Facebook page. "They are attacking Senate Bill 613, Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act, based on LIES!"
Responding to pressure from the NRA, Missouri's Republican-dominated Senate voted yesterday to cut a Democratic amendment from Nieves' extreme pro-gun bill, SB 613. The amendment would have required gun owners report a stolen firearm within 72 hours.
The amendment, offered by Democrat Jamilah Nasheed, was essentially symbolic and contained no provisions for enforcement. Nasheed previously sponsored a separate bill that also mandated the reporting of lost or stolen firearms, but with criminal penalties attached.
The NRA, however, denounced the toothless amendment in SB 613 in a February 12 statement, claiming it would "create a de-facto gun owner registry." The statement incorrectly asserted that the amendment would charge gun owners with a crime for not reporting lost or stolen firearms.
The larger bill, SB 613, seeks to nullify federal gun laws and would impose criminal charges against federal agents trying to enforce them within Missouri.
At first, Nieves tried using a conciliatory tone with the NRA. He touted his long relationship with the powerful lobbying group, telling reporters that he hoped the NRA would soon recognize the obvious error and retract its opposition. But that did not happen.
After the amendment was cut by senate republicans yesterday, the NRA released a new statement withdrawing its opposition to the gun bill, writing that "NRA-ILA is neutral once again on Senate Bill 613."
In an emailed statement to Daily RFT, NRA director of state and local affairs Chuck Cunningham reiterated the group's neutral stance.
"We did not support Senate Bill 613 before the Nasheed amendment was adopted and still take no position on it now that that amendment was removed - just as we did on House Bill 436 last year."
Noticeably absent in the NRA's statements, however, was the correction Nieves was hoping for. The organization has made no mention of the factual error contained in its first press release, where it accused the SB 613 of containing an "anti-gun" amendment with actual enforcement behind it.
The Second Amendment Preservation Act will go through one more vote in the Senate. If fully approved, it will then move to the House.
Though the kerfuffle between Nieves and NRA made some interesting headlines (and a bizarre press conference), it's worth noting that the Missouri legislature is speeding toward another showdown with Governor Jay Nixon, who vetoed a similar nullification bill last year.
This year, it's not just federal gun regulations at stake. The broader push to nullify federal laws in Missouri has grown considerably. Nieves has introduced a constitutional amendment, SJR 38, that would nullify a host of federal laws including gun regulation, abortion and even the designation of hate crimes.
Continue for more news on nullification in Missouri, and the debate over the Tenth Amendment...
Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.