BUSCH-WHACKED 

Somebody sends two threatening letters to beer baron August A. Busch III, so a California animal-rights activist spends three weeks in St. Louis-area jails

Gina Lynn looked thinner, her face paler and her eyes twice as big as they did three weeks ago. Her cheekbones were clearly defined, whereas they had been a bit pudgy before. Nevertheless, smile lines formed across her face as she talked of going home after three weeks in jail -- first at the St. Louis County Jail in Clayton and then at the St. Clair County Jail in Belleville, Ill. Lynn, a 27-year-old animal-rights activist from Boulder Creek, Calif., had been arrested many times before for engaging in civil disobedience, including chaining herself with bike locks to a dolphin tank.

But this latest arrest -- and release -- has been a bit of a mystery.

On Sept. 11, Lynn was arrested by FBI agents at her California home for ignoring a subpoena asking for her fingerprints and handwriting samples. Someone, it seems, had mailed a couple of handwritten letters in 1995 and 1996 from California to August A. Busch III in St. Louis. The letters protested the treatment of orcas -- killer whales -- at SeaWorld in San Diego, which is owned by the Anheuser-Busch Cos. According to a memo filed by Assistant U.S. Attorney David Rosen in federal court here in St. Louis and obtained by The Riverfront Times, the first letter included the statement "... you will invite violence against those who keep (an orca) in captivity." A subsequent letter upped the ante a bit, asking, "... can you handle terrorism, violence and injurious acts against your Sea World employees and/or yourself."

Even though years have passed since the letters were sent and even though A-B's own spokesman tells us no violent incidents of any kind have taken place at SeaWorld or any other A-B theme park, the letters were considered serious threats by the office of then-U.S. Attorney Edward Dowd in St. Louis. His office took the matter before a grand jury, which issued the subpoena for Lynn's fingerprints and handwriting samples. In addition to being an animal-rights activist, Lynn is a critic of the grand-jury process and, because she considers it unconstitutional, refused to comply with the subpoena. As a result, she was arrested.

Lynn was subsequently hauled to St. Louis and appeared before U.S. District Judge Rodney Sippel on Oct. 5 for a hearing on a contempt-of-court charge. Sippel had no choice but to sentence her to six months in jail for refusing the subpoena. "You hold the keys as to when you may be released," Sippel told her. "You will not be released until then."

Jennifer Brewer, the St. Louis attorney representing Lynn, said at the time that Lynn would never comply with the subpoena. "She can stay in jail two days or two months or two years and she's not going to cooperate," Brewer said. "She feels that this whole case is like saying, "If you eat a piece of meat, we'll let you go.' Well, she'll never eat meat."

And Lynn denies any involvement with the letters. "I didn't have anything to do with these letters," she says. "I am not refusing to comply because I have something to hide. I am not cooperating because my conscience will not allow me to cooperate with this unreasonable, unjustified subpoena based on nothing more than innuendo."

It's hard to say just what the subpoenas were based on, because the grand-jury process is a secretive one in which prosecutors present evidence and call witnesses and suspects are not allowed any representation. Rosen, the prosecutor in this case, won't even acknowledge that a grand jury is looking into the letters, let alone discuss any specifics of Lynn's case. "We don't comment at all" regarding grand-jury matters, says Rosen. "Gina Lynn has told you there is a grand-jury investigation. I'm not allowed to say that, even though she has."

The basis for the grand jury's subpoena was apparently the speculation of "the leader of an animal rights group in Southern California," according to Rosen's court memo, and the fact that Lynn lived in the area from which the letters were mailed. Rosen's memo also says that Lynn "had actively been involved in the efforts to have Sea World release the Orca," an allegation that Lynn denies.

"A part of me doesn't think that the (U.S. attorney) thinks I wrote those letters," says Lynn. "I think they just wanted to harass someone. I'm very well known in the animal-rights movement, and so I think they just wanted to pick on somebody and make an example of somebody -- give somebody a hard time.

"I'd say the letters can be considered mildly, indirectly, comically threatening."

If Lynn is right about Anheuser-Busch or the prosecutors wanting to make an example of her, it didn't work out very well. In fact, it may have backfired.

Within days of her imprisonment at the county jail, Lynn began a hunger strike. Her animal-rights compatriots in California, including her roommate, David Hayden, launched an effort to raise hell about her imprisonment. Hayden says protests were held at U.S. embassies in England, New Zealand and Austria; at SeaWorld in San Diego; and at an A-B brewery in Los Angeles, where Lynn's mother, Sherry Lynn Trapp, also showed up and was almost arrested.

Meanwhile, Lynn was moved from her cell and shipped to the St. Clair County Jail.

Then came the unexpected truce. Rosen told the court that the government had the "exemplars" they were seeking and that Lynn could therefore be freed. On Oct. 26, Lynn heard a guard come to her cell and say, "Gina Lynn, bunk and junk," meaning, "Get your stuff together -- you're leaving."

"I thought this time I was just moving to another jail," she says. "I didn't see any reason why I should be getting out already. I talked to Jennifer (Brewer) earlier that day, and she had said that the motion for my release pending appeal was lost, mysteriously, so that didn't even go through."

For her part, Brewer says she is equally mystified by Rosen's motion. "What the government's motion says is that the government has acquired the requested exemplars, so I'm assuming that means they photocopied a letter she sent from the jail," says Brewer. "There was no other compliance from her. Everybody that knows her definitely supports her views and supports her noncompliance, so they wouldn't be trying to help out."

Though Rosen isn't talking about just how the feds got the exemplars they were seeking, Lynn has her own theory about what prompted her release.

"I know that other supporters around the country have been writing and calling the judge and the U.S. attorney to complain, so I think they were sick of all the harassment," Lynn says. "I think they realized I was more trouble than it was worth and that I was getting a lot of media and they just wanted it to be over. I think the U.S. attorney thought that this was a way that they could do it and still save face, make it look like I caved."

After her release, Lynn spent the morning in St. Louis before boarding a plane home. She spoke at a press conference outside the federal courthouse downtown, had a glass of orange juice at the St. Louis Bread Co. in the University City Loop and made a stop at the Wild Oats Community Market store on Ladue Road. Needless to say, she did not take the A-B brewery tour.

More by Adam Pitluk

  • Deep Doo-Doo
  • Deep Doo-Doo

    A professional poop-scoopin' business raises a stink over a crappy ad
    • Mar 22, 2000
  • Gremlin on the Wing
  • Gremlin on the Wing

    Why TWA keeps losing money and how Carl Icahn keeps cashing in at the airline's expense
    • Mar 1, 2000
  • DAMMED TO ETERNITY
  • DAMMED TO ETERNITY

    James Scott was sentenced to life in prison for causing a destructive levee break during the Flood of '93. But was he simply an easy scapegoat for a town raging at its devastation?
    • Jan 26, 2000
  • More »

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

© 2016 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation