Thursday, December 2, 2010

Last Collector Standing: Helen Petty on Rock & Roll Hair and Dance Parties With Her Son

Posted By on Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:43 PM

click to enlarge JON SCORFINA
  • Jon Scorfina

The cultural importance of records extends beyond the music within their grooves. Generation after generation has defined itself by its vinyl aesthetic. From Elvis Presley to The Beatles, The Sex Pistols to Madonna, the album cover has become a cultural landmark that encapsulates a unique moment in time, even up into the digital age. On a recommendation from previous collector Coreyography, we met up with V-Vegaz hairstylist and record collector Helen Petty and her five-year-old son, Tegan, to discuss vinyl's lasting stylistic importance and rock & roll haircuts.

Last Collector Standing: Since you work at V-Vegaz Style, what is your all-time favorite rock n' roll haircut? Helen Petty: There is a band called Slade. They do the original version of "Cum On Feel The Noize." I don't know the [guy's name], or what he plays. On the cover on one of the albums he has these super-short bangs with like a little mullet. (Laughs)

[Writer's note: The member is Slade guitarist Dave Hill]

As for current pop stars, is there a person with a really distinctive hairstyle? Hmm... Rihanna.

Do you ever get requests for a "Rihanna"? We do. We get that, and we had a girl come in the other day and get the Karen O from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs. The bowl cut. That was pretty awesome. That's a little bit more modern.

click to enlarge Rihanna_Rated_R.jpg

That's even kind of similar to "The Slade"! In cutting hair, have you ever had someone bring in an actual album and ask for a haircut off of the cover? I had a client of mine bring an album in. He was just down at Vintage and bought it. I think it was Joy Division. It was just one time.

Do you think albums played a major part in differentiating iconic fashion and style, or is that something that is just inherent to pop music? That's kind of a which came first: The chicken or the egg? I would have to say, yeah. Definitely in the '80s, Madonna, Pat Benatar, those kind of looks on their album covers got emulated thousands over by crazy, screaming girls. (Laughs)

Is there a difference in the way we listen to music now and the way we define style now? Now everyone has a computer. Instead of seeing the artist on the cover wearing whatever they're wearing, people go online to gossip websites for the more popular artist, or last.fm or Pandora with the photos of the artist and see it that way. Although, it's definitely less intentional.

A band like The Beatles was so defined by their haircuts. You lived through their albums through their haircuts. Like, "Oh, they have mop tops. Now their hair is longer. Now they have mustaches." The Beatles transition was spread out over a course of years and you mainly only saw it on album covers. Could that ever happen again in pop music, or is it too instantaneous now? I think it can, but it's more fleeting. If someone were to come in and say, "You know that haircut that Lady Gaga or Rihanna had?" I'd be like, "When?" You can't really say from the second album, like with the Beatles. I guess it's possible, but they'd have to bring in a photo. So I guess it's definitely not connected to their music or album art anymore. Like everything else, it just comes and goes. There is not as much staying power with artist and their image.

click to enlarge Slayed.jpg

[In] the culture of "Now" everything is disposable. People don't want records. It's the same reason people want a Kindle instead of books, which is the same reason I don't want a Kindle instead of books. You can't hold it, smell it, feel it. You don't go and pick it out. It's just a cultural shift with digital music.

Tags: ,

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

© 2017 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation