Support Local Journalism. Join Riverfront Times Press Club.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Lotus' Wavering Relationship with the Term "Jam Band"

Posted By on Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:16 AM


Something about a jam band's free-form nature lures its members into the world of electronica. Maybe it's the improvisational aspects as DJs adapt to the audience at hand? Maybe it is simply the like-mindedness, that a solid dance groove trumps all others?

Whatever the reasons, the connection between the two genres is strong, quite notably in Lotus. Lotus entered the musical landscape strictly as a jam band back in 1999, riding heavy prog riffs and sharp tempo changes among noodle-y guitar lines and funky bottom end grooves. This was way before EDM, but concurred with the techno movement's crossover-to-accessibility period, elements of which seeped in the band's collective consciousness. In time, those driving beats and purposeful grooves began to overshadow the jammy aspects of the core sound. Wisely, however, Lotus put the brakes on before succumbing to EDM's hallucinogenic temptations and alienating its own loyal audience.

But Lotus hasn't quit cold turkey either, merging the two styles into one progressive sound. Gilded Age, the its latest, is a 50-50 split, touching on the band's jam roots as well as its electronic future -- with plenty of overlap. The constant: It's all about getting a groove on.

We tracked down guitarist/keyboardist Luke Miller in the murkiness of cyberspace for an enlightening one on one about Lotus' ascension into the electronic music world, the risks of alienating fans (though making new ones), and the reissuing of Nomad, the band's first album in 2004.

Glenn BurnSilver: I remember when Lotus first started out and the music seemed to be more jam band oriented -- a prog-influenced jam band maybe. Could Lotus be considered a jam band at all?

Luke Miller: I always say we're a jam band because we do group improv with peaks and valleys, and that's an integral part of the live show. That being said, we've always aspired to be something beyond labels. To some extent that has hurt us because it's hard to market something that doesn't have an easy tagline or genre. And you can't even just throw on an album of ours and say, "This is Lotus." You have to come to a show to really know what Lotus is.

I would say that our newest material from the past couple years does not sound like what I would classify as "jam band." But I'd like to take back the term from its punch line status in mainstream culture to something that describes bands that put on amazing live shows that are always different, walk a certain tightrope in as far as taking risks on the stage, and the relationship they have with their respective fan bases. In those regards, I think "jam bands" can be some of the most dynamic experiences in a time of instant downloads, ubiquitous selfies and social media.

Compared to those early days, today's sound is much more dance-oriented in an electronic way. How gradual was that transition, and was it an easy one to make?

When we started, one of our goals was to be an electronic-sounding jam/funk band. Our inspirations were groups like the Orb, Underworld, St. Germain, LTJ Bukem, Aphex Twin, Phish, Red Hot Chili Peppers and Medeski Martin & Wood. But we didn't have keyboards, we didn't have samplers, we didn't have in-ear monitors, etc. As we got that gear and learned how to integrate it, things started to sound more electronic. So it was fairly gradual at first, just using them in improvisatory sections.

Then we started writing some hard-hitting shorter pieces to balance out the longer jam pieces. I think having more concise songs makes the longer jams more powerful and vice-versa. As does having minor-key songs and major-key songs, dance songs and ballads, guitar-based songs and electronic-based songs. All of it is bricks in the building of putting on the kind of concert we want to present every night.

It seems that you haven't abandoned your roots though, and Gilded Age is an example of this. The tracks are a split between rock songs and more electronic songs. Where do these two styles meet in Lotus?

On Gilded Age, we were trying to capture a certain feeling. So with the rock songs and electronic songs, as well as the remixes on that album, it was just different paths to the same goal. It is a little vague, but the feeling was one of nostalgia. Sometimes those nostalgic feelings make the memory better than it was, more triumphant, and sometimes it enhances the floaty feeling of not knowing where things were headed.

Is it hard having a split personality? Not just for the band, but for fans trying to decide where they fit in the Lotus world?

I don't see it as a split personality. From a writing perspective, I see it as always wanting to try something new. And while there might be some fans that only like Lotus' post-rock sounding songs and some that only like our more electronic material, my impression is that most fans typically like Lotus because it is Lotus.

Continue to page two for more.


Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

November 24, 2021

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

© 2021 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation