Let all St. Louisans pause a moment to wipe away a tear of sympathy for our 300-miles-to-the-northeast neighbor, who, in a grand show of its largess, had graciously promised to let us join in the hype by allowing us to host athletes in training and preliminary soccer matches. Oh, the honor!
OK, now that that's done with... Let's go back 100 years or so when Chicago did get the Olympics. The 1904 Olympics, to be specific.
Wait, you say, we had those Olympics!
By jingo, we did!
In 1902, St. Louis was embroiled in plans for the World's Fair, originally planned for 1903. But things weren't coming together as quickly as planned and the Fair was postponed a year...which would put it in direct competition with the Olympics in Chicago. Really, how many trips to the American Midwest in one summer could people be expected to endure?
Besides, Chicago had already stolen the 1893 World's Fair (which was what had drawn the Olympic organizers' attention to the city in the first place) and, to add insult to injury, had reversed the flow of the Chicago River to keep their sewage out of Lake Michigan, instead sending it downriver to us. They weren't going to ruin our World's Fair!
So the World's Fair organizers very cleverly wrote to the Olympic Committee, explaining that St. Louis was planning its own sporting exhibitions in conjunction with the Fair, and wouldn't it make more sense to move the Olympics a mere 300 miles and combine the events?
As we all know, the Olympic organizers appreciated the logic behind this eminently reasonable plan. The Games moved from the Chicago lakefront to Washington University, and there were songs and laughter and hot dogs, and St. Louis has not enjoyed any international attention since.
(For a more complete -- though slightly Chicago-centric -- account of these events, check out this report from Chicago Public Radio.)