Same Rams Who Stuck With Leonard Little Say No To Vincent Jackson For DUI Issues

The Rams give Vincent Jackson a headache too. - Image via
The Rams give Vincent Jackson a headache too.
Image via
The Rams give Vincent Jackson a headache too.
There are several reasons the Rams shouldn't have traded for Chargers wide receiver Vincent Jackson.

-San Diego was reportedly asking for a second-round draft pick and cash in exchange for Jackson. That's a hefty price to pay for the Rams, a franchise that should be focusing on the future instead of attempting to win now.

-Jackson snagged nine touchdown passes and racked up 1,167 yards receiving last year but he benefited from playing on a team with a strong running game and a top tier quarterback. That said, he's better than anyone the Rams currently have at receiver.

-And the big issue: Jackson violated the league's personal conduct policy and is ineligible to play until week 5 (or week 7 if he goes untraded) because of a DUI incident last January, his second drunk driving arrest as a Charger (the first came back in 2006.)

But how in the world can the Rams use Jackson's DUI issues as justification for not trading for him -- as Jim Thomas of the Post-Dispatch reports is the case this afternoon -- when they stuck with Leonard Little for so many years?

A little history for the uninitiated: Little pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter charges in 1998 after he plowed into a woman's car in downtown St. Louis and killed her while driving with a BAC more than twice the legal limit. Then, in 2004, Little was charged with felony DUI after Ladue police pulled him over for speeding on I-64 and noticed the defensive end, "had bloodshot and watery eyes, smelled of alcohol and failed three roadside sobriety tests." (Little refused a breathalyzer and was eventually found not guilty of the charge.)

Despite his legal troubles, Little remained with the Rams until the end of last season. He is currently a free agent.

Aaron Schafer wondered in his Daily RFT post yesterday afternoon which PR move would be worse for the Rams -- spending big to bring in a wide receiver with off-field problems or standing pat and continuing to get pounded every Sunday because they can't pass the ball down the field.

Now we have the answer: standing pat and using those off-field problems as a flimsy excuse for their inaction.
Scroll to read more St. Louis Metro News articles (1)


Join Riverfront Times Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.