Join Riverfront Times Press Club. Because No News is Bad News.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

To Pork or Not to Pork?

Posted By on Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:48 AM

www.ukagriculture.com

pigmating.jpg

My post yesterday, which linked to a study by porkbusters.org that put Senator Claire McCaskill in a tie for the third-worst when it comes to voting for pork-barrel reform, created a bit of a stir.

McCaskill spokeswoman Adrianne Marsh e-mailed this morning to refute the claim, writing:

I believe the website www.porkbusters.org only utilizes select votes to present skewed information that frankly misrepresents the records of the newer members of the Senate. The tally actually counts five of the 12 votes they base their ranking system on against Senator McCaskill when she was actually not even in the Senate to cast those votes. Additionally, the database doesn't even take into account whether or not the Senator actually participates in the earmark process, which Senator McCaskill has abstained from this year.

The study did, in fact, count against her record five votes that took place before McCaskill took office. In the voting opportunities that transpired on her watch, she was 2 for 7 in voting for reform. (According to porkbusters' accounting method, that would give the senator a 28.5 -- good for 42nd-best, in the middle of the pork pack.)

She has been praised in the past for her attempts to declassify defense appropriations.

McCaskill points primarily to her support of the DeMint amendment in January, which was intended to "disclose the size, purpose and sponsor of earmarks slipped into congressional bills." She came under some scrutiny for this too, however, and in January was named "Porker of the Month" by a group called Citizens Against Government Waste for her initial vote against the amendment. After some language in the act was changed, it unanimously passed the Senate.

You can come to your own conclusions about McCaskill's record on pork-barrel spending by looking at her voting history.

-Keegan Hamilton

Tags: , ,

Riverfront Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of St. Louis and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep St. Louis' true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

September 23, 2020

View more issues

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

© 2020 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation