Join Riverfront Times Press Club. Because No News is Bad News.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Photo ID Voting Requirement Rears Its Partisan Head -- Again

Posted By on Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:54 PM

Robin Carnahan says a photo ID requirement will disenfranchise thousands of voters - FLICKR.COM/PHOTOS/CHRISTHEDUNN
  • flickr.com/photos/christhedunn
  • Robin Carnahan says a photo ID requirement will disenfranchise thousands of voters
If there is but one issue Secretary of State Robin Carnahan would like to take off the table and wish into the cornfield, it is the requirement that voters show photo identification before they are allowed to cast a ballot.

When the U.S. Supreme Court last year upheld a tough Indiana law that mandates government-issued ID's, cries rang out that the decision could keep minorities, poor people and other traditional Democratic supporters from voting.

Now, with the prospect of a razor-tight U.S. Senate race looming on the political horizon between Carnahan and (most likely) Congressman Roy Blunt, the state's top elections official has no use for a proposed state constitutional amendment to require voters to present a state-sanctioned photo ID.
FLICKR.COM/PHOTOS/COOKIEDUSTER
  • flickr.com/photos/CookieDuster
"This proposal," Carnahan said earlier this week, "would make it difficult or impossible for thousands of eligible Missourians to cast a ballot." In fact, Carnahan's office says there are 230,000 voters -- nearly half of them residing in the Democratic strongholds of St. Louis City, St. Louis County and Kansas City -- who might not be able to vote because they lack the proper ID.

Carnahan does acknowledge that the proposed amendment would provide "free" government-issued photo ID, but says the underlying documents (proof of identity, proof of residency, and so on) can be expensive and difficult to obtain.

This political hot potato is nothing new. In 2006, a version of the photo ID bill was passed in the state legislature. This triggered a class-action suit and the law was overturned by the Missouri Supreme Court two months before the 2006 election.

Tags: ,

Riverfront Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of St. Louis and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep St. Louis' true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

September 9, 2020

View more issues

Newsletters

Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

© 2020 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation