Support Local Journalism. Join Riverfront Times Press Club.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Metro's Advertising Rules Allows Easy Censorship, Removal of Gay Pride Ad Latest

Posted By on Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:30 AM

click to enlarge The Pride St. Louis banner as it appears on Metro's website. - METROSTLOUIS.ORG
In the end, Metro admits it screwed up. The St. Louis public transit agency should never have removed advertisements from its buses for this month's gay pride festival, PrideFest 2012.

It was unclear yesterday just how many Pride St. Louis advertisements disappeared from Metro buses this week after a transit employee questioned whether the banners violated the agency's advertising policy. A Metro spokeswoman described the removal of the ads as a miscommunication and promised they'd be back on buses a.s.a.p.

As Riverfront Times has reported before, self-censorship of advertisements by Metro is nothing new thanks to the agency's overly broad restrictions.

In 2010 the transit agency pulled ads for Soulard's Octoberfest much to the dismay of the beer festival's organizers. And while the Octoberfest banners did contain copious amounts of cleavage that could perhaps be interpreted to violate Metro's advertising policy No. 11 (prohibiting "nudity...or materials which otherwise depict sexual activities, conduct, excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse") its unknown how the relatively tame PrideFest banner could offend Metro.

But then when you take a look at Metro's lengthy list of sixteen (!) restrictions in its "Advertising Standards and Guidelines", it becomes clear that it can ban nearly any advertisement. Prohibited from Metro's buses and MetroLink are any ads dealing with politics, tobacco, "adult" entertainment and advertisements containing graphic violence or a message intending to mock or demean a religious or ethnic group.

Then there is restriction No. 14: "Metro shall not display or maintain any advertisement that contains material which is likely to offend, discomfort, or annoy Metro customers, or make them feel unwelcome, unsafe, or uncomfortable."

Talk about a catch-all! Would an ad for PrideFest offend, discomfort or annoy a homophobe? Maybe. But does that mean it needs to be banned? Far from it.

Tags: , ,

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

January 26, 2022

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

© 2022 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation