Support Local Journalism. Join Riverfront Times Press Club.

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Take Back St. Louis Ballot Initiative: Activists Target Peabody Energy's City Tax Breaks

Posted By on Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:00 AM


Update below: Today, St. Louis activists who have regularly protested Peabody Energy with high-profile rallies are pushing forward with a new kind of action against the corporation -- one that they say has not been tried before in the city.

The coalition of groups, spearheaded by Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment (MORE), plans to deliver more than 36,000 signatures to the city's election board this morning, marking the first step in the initiative petition process. If all goes according to the group's plan, voters will have the opportunity on an upcoming ballot to amend the city charter with a measure that would prohibit the city of St. Louis from granting tax incentives to companies like Peabody.

"A big part of this ballot initiative is trying to realign how the city thinks about development," MORE organizer Arielle Klagsbrun tells Daily RFT.

See also: - Peabody Holds Meeting in Wyoming: Trying to Escape St. Louis Protest? - Photos: Seven Arch Coal Protesters Lock Themselves to 500-Pound Plant Pot - Tea Partiers Hold Flash Mob Outside Peabody Energy St. Louis

Organizers are meeting at Poelker Park across from city hall today at 10 a.m. for a rally and subsequent march to hand over the petitions.

The initiative, which the backers have labeled "Take Back St. Louis," says the city "shall not grant any Public Financial Incentive to any Unsustainable Energy Producer."


The proposed "Sustainable Energy Policy" city charter amendment -- full language below -- defines "public financial incentive" as "any economic or financial incentive offered or provided by the City," including tax reductions, credits, tax increment financing and more. And "unsustainable energy producer" is defined as an entity or organization that engages primarily in mining or extraction of fossil fuels, coal, natural gas, oil, nuclear and radioactive materials, or "other energy sources that are non-renewable."

Simply put, if this proposal successfully makes it to the ballot and voters approve it, Peabody, which is headquartered in St. Louis, would be blocked from accessing tax breaks (as would other entities that do a million dollars or more of business with Peabody).

MORE says that the city of St. Louis gave Peabody $61 million in tax breaks in 2010 (though the company has disputed that number).


"The fact that we have 36,000 signatures shows that there are 36,000 people that want to have a vote on this," Klagsbrun says.

To get on the ballot, only 22,000 signatures are required.

If the election board certifies the signatures, then the proposal will go to the city board of aldermen, which would essentially have a symbolic vote on the matter. Because the initiative is a change to city charter, it has to go directly to voters; it would presumably be on the citywide ballot in March of next year.

"This kind of an approach...hasn't been used in St. Louis, and nothing like this has been put forward nationally either," Klagsbrun says.

click to enlarge VIA FACEBOOK

A spokeswoman for the mayor's office tells Daily RFT that the city does not yet have a comment until it reviews the final language of the submitted proposal.

Attorneys already organizing against the measure, however, have told the Beacon and the Post-Dispatch that the initiative will likely face legal challenges and argue that the amendment is so broad it "would shut down city government" and "devastate the city..."

Critics say the language could be interpreted to even "block basic city services."

"We've had lawyers look over the petitions," Cheyenne Thomas, another organizer with the Take Back St. Louis campaign, tells Daily RFT. "We're not worried."

"The Take Back St. Louis initiative brings in the resources that we need and also allows us to use tax dollars to help sustain our land and our economy," Thomas says.

Continue for the full language of the proposed amendment and a response from Peabody.

Tags: , ,

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

June 16, 2021

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

© 2021 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation