Support Local Journalism. Join Riverfront Times Press Club.

Thursday, March 10, 2016

Social House II Beats U. City in Court; Judge Denies Restraining Order

Posted By on Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:38 PM

click to enlarge Servers at the Social House II show off the body paint the concept is known for. - PHOTO COURTESY OF INSTAGRAM/SOCIAL HOUSE
  • Photo courtesy of Instagram/Social House
  • Servers at the Social House II show off the body paint the concept is known for.
Pasties and body paint, here we come.

Social House II, the newest bar to open on the Loop, has beaten back University City's request for a temporary restraining order to bar it from operating. St. Louis County Circuit Judge Joseph Walsh III found a reasonable likelihood that the bar would prevail on the merits.

But these topless torsos aren't out the woods yet. A hearing at City Hall tomorrow seeks to strip the bar, a spinoff of Soulard's Social House concept, of its liquor license.

At issue is whether the bar has a current liquor license and commercial occupancy permit. Its owner, John Racanelli, has argued via his attorney Albert Watkins that he is in good standing — after closing the Market Pub House, he filed for a new "fictitious name" as Social House II, and the city can't meddle in a mere rebranding.

But University City, taking umbrage at the particulars of that rebranding, has moved to shut down the rebranded venture, with a request for a restraining order in court running congruently with the process at City Hall to challenge the liquor license. 

Watkins says the city process will almost certainly continue even with the judge's ruling today — though he urges the city to take note of what the judge found (namely, that while the court process continues in St. Louis County, the bar may well have its paperwork in order).

"At the end of the day, what the city needs to do is pass a law saying you can't have body-painted women and men be servers," he says. "They need to pass a law, and then everyone can challenge that law up to the Supreme Court of the state of Missouri. That's how it's done — not by jack-booted brown shirts acting with overreach and heavy-handedness."

We'll stay on the story.

Editor's note: We corrected this post after publication to name the judge who actually ruled at today's hearing. It was Judge Walsh, not Judge Permuter. We regret the error.

We welcome tips and feedback. Email the author at [email protected]

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Riverfront Times Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Riverfront Times Club for as little as $5 a month.

Read the Digital Print Issue

January 19, 2022

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

© 2022 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation