Join Riverfront Times Press Club. Because No News is Bad News.

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Ferguson Protesters Lose Appeal Against St. Louis County's Interfering Law

Posted By on Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 6:06 AM

St. Louis cops can still arrest protesters for obstructing them in 'any manner whatsoever.' - PHOTO BY DANNY WICENTOWSKI
  • St. Louis cops can still arrest protesters for obstructing them in 'any manner whatsoever.'

A state appellate court has ruled against two Ferguson protesters, who challenged a St. Louis County ordinance that allows cops to lock up anyone who interferes "in any manner whatsoever" with police work.

The catch-all ordinance has been used to arrest hundreds of protesters since Michael Brown was killed in 2014 by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson.

The Rev. Melissa Bennett and audiologist Koach Baruch Frazier were both arrested in 2014 during a demonstration outside the Ferguson police station. The University City residents later sued the county, county Counselor Peter Krane and then-Attorney General Chris Koster, arguing the ordinance was unconstitutional.

Among their complaints was the idea that the language of the ordinance is too vague. It leaves it up to cops on the street to decide when a protester has obstructed or interfered with police work.

Attorneys Maggie Ellinger-Locke of the National Lawyers Guild and Brendan Roediger of the Saint Louis University Law Civil Litigation Clinic represented Bennett and Frazier.

During a hearing in October in front of the Eastern District of Missouri Court of Appeals, Ellinger-Locke suggested police could even interpret the law as it was written to mean lawyers shouting advice to arrested clients were in violation.

But the three-judge panel ruled in Tuesday's decision that the ordinance only covers physically intervening.

"We interpret the Ordinance as applying only to physical interferences and obstructions," Judge Kurt Odenwald wrote in the decision. "Therefore, police officers have guidance from the Ordinance that only physical conduct is prohibited, and the Ordinance does not contain an impermissible delegation to police officers for resolution based on a subjective basis."

Whether that's the way police officers will apply the law in the real world remains to be seen. Attorney Carl Becker, who represented the county, argued in October that the ordinance might extend to verbal interference, such as someone screaming in the ear of an officer attempting to give first aid.

We welcome tips and feedback. Email the author at or follow on Twitter at @DoyleMurphy.

Riverfront Times works for you, and your support is essential.

Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of St. Louis and beyond.

Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.

Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep St. Louis' true free press free.

Read the Digital Print Issue

April 14, 2021

View more issues


Never miss a beat

Sign Up Now

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

Best Things to Do In St. Louis

© 2021 Riverfront Times

Website powered by Foundation