Search results for: “/"”

  • Chauncey Brown, Missing Teenager, Found Shot In The Chest (Homicide No. 78)

    Chauncey Brown, Missing Teenager, Found Shot In The Chest (Homicide No. 78)

    via Flickr, Ken

    The body of 16-year-old Chauncey Brown, who was reported missing on Friday, was located Saturday in the rear of the 4700 block of Cote Brilliante. St. Louis Metropolitan Police say the teen was found face down with an apparent gunshot wound in the chest.

    Another 16-year-old black male has been taken into custody in connection to the shooting.

    Brown, who lived on the 2900 block of Keokuk, had gone out Friday night with two friends to Club 187, located on Martin Luther King Drive and Marcus Avenue. They ran into several individuals they were feuding with, and witnesses say one of those individuals threatened to shoot Brown and his friends with a handgun.

    See Also: Kevin Davis, 40, Stabbed Multiple Times In Back (Homicide No. 77)
    Trying to avoid confrontation, Brown’s group left the club. Confrontation followed, however, in the form of a newer model white Dodge Challenger, whose four occupants opened fire on the group of teenagers, who scattered and ran.

    One of the victims told police that he and others searched for Brown after the coast was clear, but they could not find him. He was reported missing Friday afternoon, and after a search officers found his body on Saturday.

    Police say they recovered the car used in the drive-by shooting, and that the investigation is ongoing.

    Here’s the full statement by the police:

    Incident: Homicide

    Location: 4700 block of Cote Brilliante (rear)

    Date/Time: 09/27/13 to 09/28/13 @ 1557

    Victim #1: Chauncey Brown, a 16-year old black male of the 2900 block of Keokuk

    Victim #2: 16-year old black male (not injured)

    Victim #3: Unknown

    Suspect: A 16-year old black male has been taken into custody. The vehicle used in
    the incident has been recovered.

    On 9/28/13, The Homicide Section was requested to 4700 block of Cote Brilliante (rear) for a victim of a shooting. The victim was located facedown with an apparent gunshot wound to his chest. He was pronounced deceased by EMS. On 9/27/13, the victims were at “Club 187”, which is located on Martin Luther King and Marcus. The victims and witnesses observed several suspects they had a prior feud with at this location. One of the suspects threatened to shoot victims with a handgun. To avoid a confrontation, the victims left the club. According to witnesses, a newer model, white Dodge Challenger, occupied by four black males, drove toward the victims. The suspects fired several gunshots at the victims from the moving vehicle. Victim #2 and witnesses advised they searched for Victim #1, but failed to locate him because the area in which he was last seen was very dark. On 09/27/13 at a 4 p.m. Victim #1 guardian contacted police stating the victim had not been seen and had not responded to numerous phone calls or text messages. The guardian stated Victim #1 had gone to a party the night before at Club 187. Aware that officers had previously responded to calls for shoots fired in the area of Dr. Martin Luther King and Marcus, officers responded to area and conducted a search and located Victim #1 in the rear of the 4700 block of Cote Brilliante. Victim #3 ran from the scene hasn’t been identified as of yet. A 16-year old black male has been taken into
    custody. The vehicle used in the incident has been recovered. The investigation is
    ongoing.

    Follow Daniel Wicentowski on Twitter at @D_Towski. E-mail the author at [email protected].

  • The Dark Wall: Legendary tornado chaser Tim Samaras’ last ride

    The Dark Wall: Legendary tornado chaser Tim Samaras’ last ride

    Before it came for him, Dan Robinson watched the thing grow. It began as a bolus that descended out of the storm, projecting needlelike vortices that lanced the wheat fields. Columnar towers 100 yards wide gathered and darkened against the pale light, unspooling into wispy coronas that moved across the prairie beneath the two-and-a-half-mile-wide wall cloud above.

    It was a little after 6 p.m. on May 31. Dozens of storm chasers were navigating back roads beneath a swollen mesocyclone that had brought an early dusk to the remote farm country southwest of El Reno, Oklahoma. Robinson, a website designer and chaser from St. Louis, jumped into his compact Toyota and sped east. He peered out at the tornado, now wrapping itself in rain so dense that he struggled to make out its leading edge. He swore it was moving farther away. If he got out ahead of it, he reasoned, he might get a better look.

    For seven miles, he raced the tornado over dirt roads. It spanned close to a mile, but it would have looked like a shapeless wall of torrential rain to the untrained eye. The last time he’d had a good bead on the funnel, it was tracking east-southeast. Now, as he drove south, he could tell something had changed. It was nearly imperceptible, the way mountains loom larger as you drive toward them. But in 30 seconds, the darkness on the horizon was filling his entire field of vision.

    “I’m getting too close,” he said to himself.

    His view to the south was wide open, a country of buffalo grass, red cedar and scrubby blackjack oak. He glanced out of the passenger window, but he couldn’t find the tornado’s outline. That was worrisome. Robinson didn’t like getting in front of tornadoes he couldn’t see.

    He rolled up to Highway 81 but stopped. The mass was already passing over. Robinson drove across the highway’s four lanes and picked up a gravel road. He caught sight of something out of the corner of his eye.

    A gray, vaporous curtain swept toward the road ahead of him.

    At the heading and speed he thought the tornado had been traveling, there was no reason it should be this close. Yet his windshield was lashed by bands of rain. A darker form took shape in the south. Robinson blew through the stop sign. The heavy rains slackened, and in that moment he knew he should not be there.

    The curtain overtook him again and the rain came faster, with a sound against his windshield like stones against glass. His Toyota lurched to the side in 100 mph gusts and began fishtailing in the gravel, causing the car’s traction control to cut power to the wheels. He backed off on the accelerator to override it. He did this again and again, never maintaining a speed faster than 42 mph.

    He punched through swirling eddies of rain. His windshield wipers couldn’t clear the water. He drove on, blind.

    If he had looked at his rearview mirror, he would have seen the headlights of a white Chevy Cobalt. Inside was Tim Samaras, one of the country’s most respected tornado scientists, who had built his career by placing sophisticated probes in the paths of oncoming tornadoes. These devices, which he called “turtles,” took measurements from inside the storms. No chaser could claim as many intercepts.

    Samaras had an uncanny ability for finding twisters and escaping them with his life. But the monster hiding in the rain that day was something he had never encountered. What neither Robinson nor Samaras could have known was that in seconds it had grown from 1 mile to 2.6 miles wide, making it the largest tornado ever documented. And it was tearing toward them across open wheat fields at highway speed. The difference between escape and incomprehensible violence was measured in hundreds of yards. And while Robinson never looked back, his rear-facing dash camera did, capturing the last living images of a legend.


    To ride with Tim Samaras and his expert forecaster, Carl Young, was to ride with the “big boys,” as Matt Grzych puts it. For two seasons, Grzych ventured with them beneath mesocyclones, the rotating masses of air that stretch for miles overhead and often spawn tornadoes. In a crew-cab GMC truck outfitted with a winch, chain saws and a mobile weather station, they’d run them down.

    He remembers the way that truck could slice through the current of rain, hail and wind feeding a supercell thunderstorm. They’d drop down ahead of the tornado, deploy devices made of hardened steel and filled with instrumentation to measure wind velocity, barometric pressure and temperature. Then they’d run as fast as the GMC could carry them.

    Much of this was well documented on the Discovery Channel’s Storm Chasers. But it only told part of the story. Samaras and Young were one component of a much larger endeavor. Left out was the rest of TWISTEX, a loose confederation of PhDs, trained spotters and meteorologists who fanned out behind the tornadoes in Chevy Cobalts, assembling themselves into a dragnet of atmospheric measurements. As important as it was to get readings from inside tornadoes, they also needed to understand the environment that caused them to form, intensify and unravel. But that part of the operation didn’t make for good TV. So the camera crew focused on Grzych, Samaras, and Young, and their daredevil tornado intercepts.

    The chasers were willing to get close enough to smell ripped-up grass or the scent of splintered lumber and shredded insulation given off by the twister. Once, when they ventured into Dixie Alley and found a tornado hidden inside the deep pine woods near Canton, Mississippi, Grzych pleaded with them to stay out of the trees. But Samaras had already announced that they would deploy a probe at all costs. They narrowly missed a tornado that felled timber and power lines as it crossed the road no more than 100 yards in front of them. He told the cameras that this was why they chased — to feed hard data into the study of these dimly understood and deadly phenomena. The risks, for him, were worth it. Yet they were carefully calculated, and he had always managed to bring his crew out alive.

    Samaras, a slight, professorial-looking man with an aquiline nose and kind eyes, was an autodidact with only a high school education. He nonetheless went on to become a star engineer at Applied Research Associates in Littleton, Colorado, specializing in blast testing and airliner crash investigation. The National Transportation Safety Board recognized him for his work on TWA flight 800, which exploded over the Atlantic Ocean in 1996, killing 230 passengers.

    Samaras loved a puzzle, to know how things worked. And there were few greater mysteries than the titans that tore through the plains east of his home in the Colorado foothills. He began chasing in his twenties, wanting only to be near them, transfixed by their terrible beauty, by the sounds and the way they smelled. When experiencing the tornadoes was no longer enough and his analytical mind sought questions that his eyes couldn’t answer, his engineering ability and resources transformed a passing fascination into a legitimate scientific pursuit. Using a wind tunnel, he developed turtle probes that remained firmly anchored to the ground even as they took a direct hit.

    They were put to the ultimate test on June 24, 2003, outside Manchester, South Dakota. Samaras jogged into a roadside ditch, hefting a probe as an EF-4 tornado bore down on him. Moments later, the tornado struck the instrument. Samaras watched from a safe remove as houses were blown apart like piles of leaves. The tornado that razed Manchester registered the steepest drop in barometric pressure on record, and it was captured on Samaras’ turtle.

    The finding catapulted him to fame. National Geographic wanted to underwrite his research. He partnered with the University of Iowa’s famed tornado laboratory. Boeing paid him to field-test hail-resistant skin for its aircraft. He found a chase partner in Carl Young, a bit-part Hollywood actor turned atmospheric science student who was quickly becoming a promising forecaster. He began collaborating with Bruce Lee and Cathy Finley, University of Northern Colorado researchers who studied the forces at work outside of tornadoes. TWISTEX was born.

    The group authored peer-reviewed papers for Monthly Weather Review and the American Meteorological Society. They could lay claim to nearly every measurement taken from within a tornado. This was partially because Samaras was a brilliant engineer, but it was also because no one could read a storm quite like him. Young excelled at choosing the right storm systems using Doppler radar, but once they sat beneath the mesocyclone, Samaras’ ability to spot the signs led them to the tornado.

    Samaras was an aggressive, dogged chaser, who often had to be reminded by his colleagues to stop and eat. But he was also beloved. To his children, he was the father who set up a camera on a tripod in front of the Christmas tree because they had demanded evidence of Santa’s existence. He once dressed his son, Paul, as a ham radio for Halloween. He was the first male Girl Scout troop leader in Colorado.

    To his chasing friends, he was the guy who had them out to his home in Bennett, Colorado, where the Great Plains met the foothills, for war stories and copious bowls of his “bunghole-burnin’ green chili.”

    To his colleagues, he was their benevolent leader and mentor.

    Samaras made sure his crew ate well and stayed in the best lodging to be found. But every chaser will tell you the pursuit exacts a price. For days, sometimes weeks at a time, they leave loved ones and place themselves at hazard — in part because they want to better understand the storms, but also because humans have always taken the measure of themselves against the natural world. Though he respected these forces, by walking away with his life from hundreds of tornadoes, in some way Samaras had shown he was equal to them.

    After the 2011 tornado season, the Discovery Channel canceled Storm Chasers, and with it a significant source of funding for TWISTEX. The next year, one of the weakest seasons on record, the team was all but dormant. But as 2013 rolled around, Samaras managed to secure a grant through National Geographic for lightning research.

    As a ballistics researcher, he had used a one-ton camera capable of capturing 150,000 frames per second to study explosions. When the government put it up for auction, he bought the hulking device for $600. Samaras replaced the film technology with digital sensors that allowed him to capture up to 1 million frames per second. The “kahuna,” as it came to be known, sought the moment of contact when intricate, negatively charged fingers of light splintered out of the sky, meeting a positive charge reaching up out of the earth. Samaras pursued yet another of nature’s most fleeting moments.

    For now, his tornado research would remain on the back burner. Samaras brought his 24-year-old son, Paul, a Star Wars geek who’d developed into a brilliant photographer and videographer. And he brought Young, his trusted chase partner. They crisscrossed the Corn Belt together, hunting lightning. If they chased twisters, it would be on their own time and on their own dime.


    On May 19, Matt Grzych sat in gridlocked traffic in Moore, a suburb of Oklahoma City, during a stalled chase. A mile-wide EF-5 tornado tore through the middle of town and across Interstate 35, uprooting sturdy oaks and shearing houses from their foundations. The elementary school near him was razed, killing seven children. Grzych watched as those around him panicked. Trucks sped through the median, some in reverse, while insulation rained down from the sky. It was the first EF-5 he’d ever witnessed. He swore he’d never chase in the Oklahoma City metro area again.

    Almost as soon as he’d posted about his experience on Facebook, he heard from an envious Young. “He called me up immediately, freaking out about how I got onto Moore,” Grzych says. “His main thing was, ‘What were you looking at in the forecast that brought you to Moore?’ Carl was all about big tornadoes.” Yet he’d never witnessed the strongest: For all their talent for finding tornadoes, neither Young nor Samaras had ever encountered an EF-5.

    Eleven days later, violent supercell thunderstorms were forecast near Oklahoma City. Samaras, Paul and Young met Cathy Finley and Bruce Lee in Guthrie, 30 miles away. They’d arrived in the Cobalt, with three turtle probes in the trunk, leaving the kahuna back in Kansas. Looking back, some of Samaras’ colleagues were surprised by his decision to use the Cobalt to attempt to deploy a probe. The four-cylinder, two-wheel-drive sedan would have been weighed down with three grown men and three heavy probes. Tony Laubach, a TWISTEX team member who had driven one, likened it to a pizza-delivery car. “It did fine,” he said. “I chased with it for many years. But it didn’t handle some roads so good. It didn’t handle high winds.”

    It was, however, economical, and TWISTEX operations were on a shoestring.

    Young was a little frustrated, Finley recalls. They’d missed a strong tornado a few days before because of Samaras’ research obligations. They weren’t about to miss the setup forming over Oklahoma, predicted to explode the following day. But Finley and Lee told them they would not be joining them for this chase. They were wary of pursuing tornadoes into densely populated areas. As they’d seen in Moore, the roads tended to clot with panicked people and the growing ranks of amateur storm chasers.

    Inside the nerve center at the National Weather Service Forecast Office in Norman, Oklahoma, a team of meteorologists peered into monitors, their faces bathed in the primary colors of Doppler radar imaging. Along one wall, a battery of flat-screen televisions was tuned to the Weather Channel and local news. Despite the boiling in the atmosphere west of Oklahoma City, the room was quiet.

    Meteorologist Jonathan Kurtz saw a complex system of storms merging, and he needed to know where they were headed. Warm, dry air was blowing out of the Rocky Mountains and rising in their lee, leaving a void of low pressure. Warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico rushed into the void along this imaginary boundary, known as the dryline, which was sitting right over central Oklahoma. The Gulf air wanted to rise, but it was being blocked by a cap of dry desert air.

    Atmospheric instability was building. Once it was warm enough near the surface, probably by late that afternoon, the Gulf air would punch through the cap. Soon, it would meet the cold, 85 mph jet stream from the north. At the same time, the vacuum created below would draw strong southerly winds. The differences in wind speed, elevation and direction of these two currents, known as wind shear, were getting ready to set this unstable air mass spinning. That was the stuff of all supercell thunderstorms. What alarmed the forecasters was the off-the-charts strength of its ingredients. Kurtz knew something big was about to happen.section break

    Samaras and Young lost sight of the tornado in the rain, but they would have known at least that it was a mile away. They were in position. They would have seen Dan Robinson driving ahead of them.

    As Robinson paused at Highway 81, he would have seen them pull up right behind him, along with the gauzy curtain of the tornado’s outer circulation. Because Young’s camera was later found, we know a little about what transpired in that car until the final minute or two.

    Samaras took a call from a reporter as Young steered along the dusty back roads. Young seemed annoyed: Samaras was supposed to be the navigator, and Young needed to know what the roads ahead looked like; they had a habit of dead-ending unexpectedly. Samaras rushed the reporter off the phone, and they began discussing their next move.

    Again and again, Samaras told Young to slow down and let the tornado get ahead of them, worried it might cut them off. But Young wanted to get farther east, to deploy a probe ahead of it. Samaras, who always made the final call in deployment situations, didn’t override him.

    They commented on how poor the visibility was becoming. They sounded confused, disoriented. Samaras said he wasn’t sure he could see the funnel anymore.

    But it was still there, growing, hooking and doubling in speed. It’s likely they were in its outer circulation, though they almost certainly didn’t realize it. Because Young put his camera down on the floorboard, there was only the sound of heavy rain, wind and their voices. No one in the car was panicking. At the end of the video, perhaps a minute or two before the tornado overtook them, Samaras said in a matter-of-fact tone: “We’re in a bad spot.”

    Robinson’s rear dash cam tells the rest of the story. At 6:20 p.m., as Robinson fled, the thin, drifting miasma gave way to something opaque and iron gray. Headlights behind him shrank farther and farther into the distance. As Robinson was pummeled by rain bands and 100-mph winds, the camera lost track of them.

    A few moments later, Samaras’ car crested a rise and was seen as little more than two points of light in the gathering dark. For the first time, it was as though the tornado had shed the cloak and offered the men a glimpse of itself. Its outline stood sharply against the dim horizon.

    But in a matter of seconds, it swelled to 2.6 miles wide, and its sharp edges were lost again in currents of rain. As it closed in at up to 60 mph, everyone in that car likely knew what was about to happen. Samaras’ son Paul probably trained his video camera on the tornado right up until the very end, members of TWISTEX say. But that camera was never found.

    In the last existing images of the three men alive, their headlights shone brightly as the clouds above lowered and a dark wall swallowed the horizon. They were obscured for a moment by a sheet of rain running down Robinson’s rear window. They reappeared as the faintest of lights and glimmered once more. Then, in an instant, the wall moved into the road and they were extinguished.

    Ahead of them, the way before Robinson cleared. Behind, through the rain-streaked window, there was nothing — no gravel road, no trees, no wheat fields, no sun or sky. It was as though the world had ended there.

    Robinson stopped 400 yards away. The post oaks along the road bowed toward the tornado as the storm drew wind to its core. He would always question what he did next. He would come to see differently the act of stopping, pulling his video camera from the back seat, and crow-hopping with the 80 mph gusts at his back, tearing a shoe from his foot. He knew he had gone out that day and met some other thing that he was not equal to. He knew it when a two-inch hailstone opened up a bleeding gash over his left eye. He knew it when he was sheltering in the ditch and the tornado’s outer circulation shattered his Toyota’s rear window and waylaid the world around him.


    Once the hail had passed, Sergeant Doug Gerten of the Canadian County Sheriff’s Office got out of his SUV to investigate a car sitting in a canola field. He knew it was a car only because it had a single wheel left, with the Chevy emblem on the hubcap. Otherwise, it was unrecognizable, as though it had been cubed by a salvage yard’s compactor. “There wasn’t a straight piece of metal on it,” he says.

    He could see that there was a person inside, still wearing his safety belt. He confirmed the man was dead and removed his wallet and took out the driver’s license. Gerten watched Storm Chasers, and he knew exactly who Tim Samaras was. As he began his search, he found the Cobalt’s motor half a mile away. He noted gouges in the wheat field where the car had been driven into the soil.

    Judging by where the debris field began, the car had been carried nearly half a mile before it was dropped vertically on its rear end. Somewhere in between, deputies found Young in a ditch. Paul’s body wouldn’t be located until early the next morning. The fire department cut Samaras out of the Cobalt, and a wrecker hauled it off. Gerten met Kathy Samaras a few days later. She had come to see where her husband and son had died.

    “You’ve got to admire the lady,” Gerten says. “She’s held up better through this than I would have.”

    At a memorial in Littleton, Colorado, she said she didn’t know how she was still standing.

    From time to time over the next month or so, Gerten drove down that stretch, looking for the equipment he knew must still be out there. On July 3, he caught sight of a small black object, half submerged in the creek. He stopped, clambered down into water that was only a few inches deep, and came up with Young’s camera.


    The day after the storm, Gabe Garfield of the National Weather Service set out from Norman with a team to explore a savaged landscape. Little had actually been damaged, primarily because the tornado had passed through unpopulated farm country. The most incredible evidence he saw was in high-resolution Doppler images collected by the University of Oklahoma.

    Most tornadoes of that size maintain a fairly straight heading and make a left turn as they weaken. This tornado’s arc turned sharply, growing in size, speed and intensity. The 2.6-mile-wide wedge was incredible. Inside were swarms of sub-vortices, 200-yard-wide tornadoes within the tornado, whose wind speeds approached 300 mph. It “was designed to kill storm chasers,” in the words of veteran chaser Amos Magliocco.

    On a recent afternoon, beneath a wide dome of sky over the Southern Plains, barbwire lay in coils in the ditch. Steel fence posts laid bent and flat against the earth. A single headlight, the kind belonging to a sedan, sat just off the road. Pieces of metal and glass glinted in the field, where the car would have been carried.

    Close by, a stained wooden board had been driven into the ground and etched with initials: TS, PS, CY, all arrayed around a pair of wings with a twister in between. It said: R.I.P., TWISTEX, 5-31-13. Next to it was a bouquet of silk daisies and roses, a tiny American flag and a car’s gray floor mat. For an hour, not a single car or truck passed through this remote stretch of road. There was only the sound of the wind blowing down.


    Matt Grzych will always wonder why Samaras, Paul and Young were in that place at that moment. Were the winds and the weight of three men too much for the Cobalt? Did the engine fail? Did they blow a tire? Or had they simply been playing the odds for too long?

    “Everyone had that false impression in their minds, that we’re too good, that we’ll always beat it,” he says. “As humans, we think of it as a solid object. We plan our actions around a solid object. But they’re ghosts. They’re in one place and can appear in another.”

    Their deaths have forced the insular storm-chasing community to search its soul. None from their ranks had ever died in a tornado. And this wasn’t some amateur yahoo with an iPhone. Samaras was the godfather of this pursuit. Now he and the compacted hull of his white Chevy Cobalt had become the glaring evidence of their own fallibility. If so great a man could not save himself, how could any?

    Yet Dan Robinson had saved himself, a fact that had not ceased to puzzle him. He had stopped and filmed the thing as it passed, barely out of its reach. He should have been poring over the incredible, once-in-a-lifetime footage his video cameras had captured. But he couldn’t bring himself to look at any of it for days.

    When he finally saw those headlights, Robinson was plagued by the same questions that plagued Grzych. “I’ve thought about this hundreds of times,” he says. “I can’t imagine they were doing anything different than me. I wonder why they slowed down and got so far behind.”

    He’s haunted by the blind randomness of it all. Had the tornado’s arc been just a degree wider, he isn’t so sure he would have survived. He was about to run out of road.

    “There’s always been chasers who pushed the limits, got too close, and I’ve certainly done that a few times myself,” Robinson says. “You’d think maybe it should have been somebody who did something reckless or careless. It shakes you up when you realize that someone with his experience can end up in that situation.”

    One of things Samaras loved about the study of tornadoes was that it remains a wide-open frontier. So many fundamental questions go unanswered.

    And perhaps that’s what is so maddening about what happened to Carl Young and Tim and Paul Samaras. There is no simple explanation, no single factor. As unknowable as the chain of random events that give rise to tornadoes is, so too was the series of decisions that ended three lives.

  • Wildwood Crash Leaves 3 Teens Dead: Sisters Lauren, Kathleen Oliver, Christopher Lenzen

    Wildwood Crash Leaves 3 Teens Dead: Sisters Lauren, Kathleen Oliver, Christopher Lenzen

    Rockwood School District

    Lauren Oliver.

    Three teenagers are dead after a tragic car crash in Wildwood, police and school officials are confirming this morning.

    A Rockwood School District spokesman tells Daily RFT that the deceased are: Lauren Oliver, an eighteen-year-old graduate of Eureka High School; her sister Kathleen Oliver, a seventeen-year-old senior at Eureka; and Christopher Lenzen, an eighteen-year-old graduate of Marquette High School. A fourth student, Olivia Dames, an eighteen-year-old graduate of Eureka High, was injured.

    Bryan Ludwig, St. Louis county police lieutenant, tells us that police got a call at around 9:40 p.m. yesterday for a crash at the 18000 block of Homestead Manor Drive in Wildwood. The accident was a single-vehicle incident involving a 2013 Infiniti G37S convertible with the top down, he says.

    Police believe Lenzen was the driver.

     

    Chris Lenzen. - Rockwood School District

    Rockwood School District

    Chris Lenzen.

    The vehicle left the roadway while traveling southbound and struck the side of a residence backyard deck. The vehicle, Ludwig says, came to rest in a wooded area behind the house.

    The accident is still under investigation. Ludwig says he believes the sisters were pronounced dead on the scene and the male was transported and later pronounced deceased.

     

    Kathleen Oliver. - Rockwood School District

    Rockwood School District

    Kathleen Oliver.

    “Our hearts are breaking for the families of these young people,” Kim Cranston, chief communications officer with the Rockwood School District, tells Daily RFT. “Today, many people in the Rockwood School District are grieving. These were outstanding young women and a young man, and we are so sorry for the loss of their lives.”

    Lenzen, she says, was an “outstanding athlete” who played varsity basketball for four years and varsity baseball for three years.

     

    Olivia Dames, who was injured in the crash. - Rockwood School District

    Rockwood School District

    Olivia Dames, who was injured in the crash.

    “Both of the young women who died in the crash were also very involved in their school,” she continues, citing cheerleading, cross country and show choir as some of their many activities.

    “Our focus is on supporting our students and staff as they process this tragedy,” Cranston says, noting that they have additional counselors available working with students.

    “Right now,” she says, “it’s really absorbing the shock.”

    The students, she says, were role models and involved in a variety of teams. “Those teams are like second families, lots of very close and deep relationships.”

    She adds, “We’re supporting each other and grieving.”

    Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

  • Albert Pujols Accused of Steroid Use: “I Know for A Fact He Was,” Says Jack Clark

    Albert Pujols Accused of Steroid Use: “I Know for A Fact He Was,” Says Jack Clark

    Albert Pujols in 2006.

    See also:Why Is Jack Clark Now Accusing Albert Pujols? Recall 2006 Chris Mihlfeld Steroid Rumors

    Albert Pujols definitely used performance-enhancing drugs.

    So says former Cardinals slugger Jack Clark, now radio co-host with Kevin Slaten at WGNU (920 AM).

    After Slaten said on-air that he long believed Pujols “has been a juicer,” Clark replied: “I know for a fact he was. The trainer that worked with him, threw him batting practice from Kansas City, that worked him out every day, basically told me that’s what he did.”

    Chris Mihlfeld, once Pujols’ personal trainer, directly admitted it to him more than a decade ago, Clark said.

    Mihlfeld “had told me what he was doing with ‘Poolie’ — threw him batting practice, worked him out, shot him up, all that stuff,” Clark said on his show, the Post-Dispatch reports, noting that Pujols’ agent this week declined comment.

     

    Slaten and Clark. - via

    via

    Slaten and Clark.

    Mihlfeld, however, is denying these latest accusations altogether.

    See also:
    Albert Pujols Is “Bitter” About The Way Cardinals Handled His Departure
    Cardinals Security Kicks Out Fan on Star Wars Night… For Having Stormtrooper Mask?

    Via NBC Sports, Mihlfeld offered this strongly worded statement:

    I haven’t even talked to Jack Clark in close to 10 years. His statements are simply not true. I have known Albert Pujols since he was 18 years old and he would never use illegal drugs in any way. I would bet my life on it and probably drop dead on the spot if I found out he has. As before once again both Albert and myself have been accused of doing something we didn’t do.

    Why, then, is Clark making these comments?

    “I have no idea. Alls I can say is that it is absolutely not true,” Mihlfeld responded. “I never said those things to Jack Clark or anyone else because they never happened. That’s all I need to say.”

     

    Albert Pujols in 2011. - via Wikimedia Commons

    Albert Pujols in 2011.

    Clark apparently made these accusations last Friday (audio here) and again on Monday (audio here).

    As the P-D notes, it has never been reported that Pujols failed an MLB performance-enhancing substance test or is under investigation.

    In 2006, Pujols responded to the accusations, saying:

    Why would I do something like that to my family? Why would I do something like that to God? Why would I do something like that to my team? Just to try to gain some small extra? It’s part of what I believe: What you do in the dark will come into the light. I have nothing to fear. I’m just tired of hearing about it.

    Clark this week told the P-D in an interview that he and Mihlfeld spent a lot of time together in 2000 when they were with the Los Angeles Dodgers, saying, “I had asked him about conditioning and working me out, what he would do for me, and he asked me whether I had ever thought of taking some steroids…. He just told me that he wanted me to get started on steroids and he had some other guys that were doing it. He told me that’s how he’s conditioning this guy that he met out of high school and college and he looked like he was going to be a star, keep an eye on him.”

    Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

  • My Girlfriend’s Breasts Are Too Small. Help!

    My Girlfriend’s Breasts Are Too Small. Help!

    Welcome to Ask Willie D, where the Geto Boys MC answers reader questions about matters, in his own words, “funny, serious or unpredictable.” Something on your mind? Ask Willie D!

     

    Photo courtesy of Peter Beste

    Photo courtesy of Peter Beste

    TWO SIDES TO A FRIENDSHIP
    Dear Willie D:

    The other day I decided to call an old friend to catch up. From the moment she said hello she went on a diatribe about how I don’t call her or come to her house anymore since I married my husband. Granted, I don’t call as much and have only been to her house once in the past year, but the coin she’s flipping has two sides. I told her that she didn’t have to wait on my call. If she wanted to talk she could have called me first. And why do I have to be the one driving across town?

    Just thinking about it has my mind going all the way back to the beginning of our friendship. I’ve always been the one to make the first move. Whenever we went anywhere we usually took my car and I drove. If we were shopping and she was short on cash or didn’t have money, I was the one who pitched in. We have 15 years of history and she is the sweetest person, but I’m starting to think she’s a user; at the least she’s taking me for granted. How do I address this issue and remain friends with her?

    Two Sides:

    When people claim to be your friend and the only time you get to speak to them is when you call them first or they need something, that’s code for, “I don’t value your friendship the way you value mine.” It’s also a sign of selfishness. You already addressed the issue when you told her she could have called you first and when you put her on blast about having to drive across town. Now whether she wants to remain friends or not, that’s on her.

    GIRLFRIEND’S BREASTS TOO SMALL

     

    Dear Willie D:

    My girlfriend is beautiful, smart and fun to be around. But if she had bigger boobs she would be perfect. I told her a few times that I think she should have her breasts augmented but she is afraid of surgery and the possible side effects.

    I told her she has nothing to worry about and that I would even pay for the surgery but she won’t budge. To get back at her I might not call her or answer my phone for three or four days. Then I’ll finally pick up and halfheartedly kick it with her for a few days and start the cycle all over again.

    I really want her to get the surgery. What can I tell her to convince her that she has nothing to be afraid of? Help a brother out, Willie!

    Boobs Man:

    I don’t know what some men’s fascination is with boobs. They don’t do anything. I understand how important they are for women cosmetic-wise and if a woman wants them fondled during foreplay and intercourse because it arouses her, I get that. But implants take the sensation out of breasts so I really don’t see the point in augmentation. That’s like cutting off your hair to wear a wig.

    Kill the sixth-grader games of going days without calling your girl because she won’t let you pressure her into doing something she doesn’t want to do. If you can’t accept her for who she is you’re not seeing the real her. You should be proud to have a girlfriend who refuses to let society dictate her image.

    She sounds like my type: beautiful, smart and fun to be around. Keep playing and the next time you go without calling her for three-four days I might answer her phone while she’s lying next to me… in her birthday suit… exhausted.

  • Ask a Mexican: What does “Viva la Raza” mean?

    Dear Mexican: I’m curious as to the meaning of the term “Viva la Raza” that I have often heard expressed by my friends and family. I know what it translates to, but I don’t know why we say it. I happen to be what some call a “half-breed,” and therein lies my dilemma. “Viva La Raza” implies that the person who says this saying or their audience is of a certain “race.” My mother’s family is from the state of Georgia and of French, Scottish and English decent, whereas my father’s family hails from New Mexico and has been in the northern part of that great state since 1627; if you count my indio ancestors (that are undoubtedly in my lineage ’cause my grand mother is short and brown), my family has been in the Santa Fe area prior to European settlement in the Americas. This makes me and my fathers people mestizos. In addition, my family may also be Jewish. It has come to light that many of the old Hispanic families of Northern New Mexico are descendants of the “hidden” Sephardim Jews that pretended to be Catholic and moved to the New World in order to escape the Spanish Inquisition. In addition, aren’t most Hispanos (that hail from north of the border) and Mexicans (from south of the border) mestizos, and didn’t most of the Indians get killed by the Spaniards and Anglos? If so, “raza” or “race” seems to be artificial and really doesn’t mean anything. Furthermore, I think this is true the world over with all of the so-called “races.” It seems to me that we are all half-breeds, mestizo, metis, mulattos or what ever you want to call us. It is my understanding that the human race is the only race, and that we all came “out of Africa.”

    With this in mind, shouldn’t we do away with “Viva La Raza” and come up with something new….perhaps “Viva La Herencia!” or “Viva La Gente!”
    NuMexiHillbilly

    Dear Wab: So many questions, so little time! I’ll just concentrate on the viva part, since the rest of your pregunta rumbles along like a Big Jim chile in a gabacho’s panza. No one is going to rally under slogans that translate as “Long live the heritage” or “Up with people” — they’re too fresa. And while I’m with you on the whole chinga tu madre toward racial classifications, “Viva la Raza” will never be dropped, nor should it. It ties anyone who says it back to the Chicano Movement, from where the term originated (the earliest citation I can find was in a 1966 Los Angeles Times article that quoted legendary activist Bert Corona as exclaiming during a fundraising dinner in LA. “Viva la causa, viva la raza, y viva la unidad — “Long live the cause, long live la raza, and long live unity”). The raza part connects the slogan to the idea of la raza cósmica — the Cosmic Race, the idea put forth by Vasconcelos of a day where humanity trumps the antiquated razas of the Enlightenment. The viva part is a direct descendent of the Grito de Dolores, the proclamation issued by Miguel Hidalgo ushering in Mexico’s War of Independence. It might seem strange to have non-Mexis shout “Viva la Raza!” in this egalitarian society, but Mexicans don’t find it racist or exclusionary, because it isn’t — after all, we all have enough female cousins who have married gabachos and bedded enough gabachitas to make us like y’all enough.

    A QUICK NOTE ON MEXICANS BEING THE FATTEST PEOPLE IN THE WORLD: Some of ustedes have sent me reports stating that Americans are no longer the fattest people in the world; Mexicans are. My reaction: who says Mexicans don’t assimilate?

    Ask the Mexican at [email protected], be his fan on Facebook, follow him on Twitter @gustavoarellano or ask him a video question at youtube.com/askamexicano!

  • Inside St. Louis’ Abandoned Railway Exchange: Bored Suburban Kids

    Inside St. Louis’ Abandoned Railway Exchange: Bored Suburban Kids

    The Railway Exchange building in Downtown St. Louis was once where teenagers went to shop, cause trouble and awkwardly stand around. It used to be Famous-Barr’s flagship store. But in 2013, Macy’s closed its doors; last year the city condemned the building. Today, it is a nuisance property where young county teenagers go to experience the blight and decay of the City of St. Louis. Last week, I joined some of them. The building and its surrounding blocks had been featured in a damning Wall Street Journal story on the “doom loop” of Downtown St. Louis. The article caught a lot of hostile feedback on X and other social media platforms. As I stood nearby, camera held up to my face, a man in his late teens or early twenties called out to me, “Hey, have you ever taken pictures in this building?” He meant the Railway Exchange. “Want to go with us? We are going to the roof for the sunset.” I reluctantly said no as I had abandoned my mediocre urban exploring dreams long ago. Then my vagabond counterparts — residents of Brentwood and Creve Coeur, respectively — reminded me that we are in St. Louis city and you could almost guarantee that no legal action would be brought against us for our delinquency. I decided to come along. To stop people from entering the Railway Exchange building, the city erected steel plates facing Locust Street. They were touted as an upgrade from the shoddy wooden boards that once attempted to keep out shitheads, scrappers and squatters, but in no time people were back in the building. Without giving away details, I’ll just say it wasn’t hard to get in. We were soon hiking up the 21-story building towards the roof. Inside was a scene straight from John Carpenter’s 1981 film Escape From New York, famously filmed in St. Louis. Complete chaos. The place was pitch black, its glass panels smashed, with holes in every wall, collapsed ceilings, stairs falling apart, amateur graffiti on the walls and the remnants of wannabe arsonists trying to start fires. Our long journey to the roof would soon be interrupted by our first group of so-called UrbExers — a group of six teenagers stomping on shattered glass. We would see two more groups of teens on our quest. In our hour-long journey inside through the 20th-century masterpiece there were no signs of squatters, just bored young adults wandering through the building. As we made our way through the labyrinth of staircases and empty offices, it was abundantly clear that the code of urban exploring had not been upheld: do not disclose your location and leave everything as it is. The view from the roof was wonderful, perhaps the most stunning sunset I’ve seen in St. Louis city. But the Railway Exchange building is a problem. In March of 2023, a dog with the St. Louis Fire Department’s search and rescue team died in the building. It is only a matter of time before someone else is seriously injured or dies. The city is attempting to use eminent domain to seize the building from its Florida-based owner. It can’t happen soon enough. Until then, the bored suburban kids coming into the city, certain that they’re never going to get in trouble, should proceed with caution. Scroll down for photos from my visit.

    Scroll down to view images
    A pedestrian crosses the street at the intersection of Olive and N. Seventh streets on April 12, 2024. The Railway Exchange is just one block away.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    A pedestrian crosses the street at the intersection of Olive and N. Seventh streets on April 12, 2024. The Railway Exchange is just one block away.
    2 of 10
    A clock is illuminated by the setting sun on the Railway Exchange Building.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    A clock is illuminated by the setting sun on the Railway Exchange Building.
    3 of 10
    The building's exterior has lovely details.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    The building’s exterior has lovely details.
    4 of 10
    The city's steel plates are meant to block trespassers.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    The city’s steel plates are meant to block trespassers.
    5 of 10
    A plaintive message is scrawled on one plate.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    A plaintive message is scrawled on one plate.
    6 of 10
    The building that once housed Famous-Barr is a post-apocalyptic scene.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    The building that once housed Famous-Barr is a post-apocalyptic scene.
    7 of 10
    Sunlight streams down on traffic on Olive Street as viewed from the Railway Exchange building.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    Sunlight streams down on traffic on Olive Street as viewed from the Railway Exchange building.
    8 of 10
    Urban explorers watch the sun set from the roof of the Railway Exchange Building in downtown St. Louis.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    Urban explorers watch the sun set from the roof of the Railway Exchange Building in downtown St. Louis.
    9 of 10
    The sunset was beautiful.

    ZACHARY LINHARES
    The sunset was beautiful.
    10 of 10
  • Missouri’s Former Slave Auction Site at Center of Fight to Rename I-70 in Montgomery County

    Missouri’s Former Slave Auction Site at Center of Fight to Rename I-70 in Montgomery County

    About 80 miles west of St. Louis on I-70 sits “Slave Rock” visible in the median of the interstate, with a name tied to the slave auctions that once occurred at the site.

    And it is because of the “shameful scenes of human bondage” that the name represents that Governor Jay Nixon announced today he does not support a plan to rename a part of the interstate there — arguing that it would erase the slave name and gloss over this dark history of the site.

    State lawmakers had widely supported legislation that included renaming a Montgomery County portion of I-70 “Graham’s Picnic Rock Highway,” — sending the proposal along to the governor — who announced today he is vetoing the measure.

    “This designation would have elevated one history of the site above all others, thereby defining this landmark and its historical significance for generations to come,” Nixon says in a statement. “This attempt to erase the name ‘Slave Rock’ from this site, without any public debate, cannot become law.”

     

    "Slave Rock" in Montgomery County. - via

    via

    “Slave Rock” in Montgomery County.

    The Graham Picnic name is a reference to Dr. Robert Graham, the former owner of the farm where the rock is located. It was apparently popular in the 1880s to drive with horse and buggy over the old Boone’s Lick Road to the Mineola Spring and Graham Cave for a picnic there.

    Census records from the mid-19th century, the governor’s office says, show that he was once a slave owner in Montgomery County.

     

    Governor Jay Nixon. - via

    via

    Governor Jay Nixon.

    Still, Nixon argues that the new name is problematic. His veto message says:

    [I]n sharp contrast to the idyllic images of picnicking travelers conjured by the name “Graham’s Picnic Rock” are the shameful scenes of human bondage represented by the rock’s other name–“Slave Rock.” The rock’s name as “Slave Rock” comes from the widely held belief that slave auctions occurred at the site, perhaps related to Graham’s slave ownership prior to abolition.

    A renaming like this, he says, requires a “robust public debate so that all interested parties’ voices can be heard.”

    The provision, however, was added as a floor amendment and thus never discussed at a public hearing, he points out.

    Here’s his full veto message.

    SB43 Veto

    Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

  • Cops: Anthony Clark Killed By Masked Suspect With Assault Rifle In Broad Daylight (UPDATE)

    Cops: Anthony Clark Killed By Masked Suspect With Assault Rifle In Broad Daylight (UPDATE)

    Update: St. Louis metro police officials have released new information on the suspect involved in the deadly shooting in broad daylight on Monday late morning. Our original coverage is below. Anthony Clark, 28, was killed outside of his home at the 5000 block of Cote Brilliante Avenue in the Ville neighborhood in north St. Louis — when a masked gunman fired shots into a car where the victim was sitting in the passenger seat, police sa.Below are photos of the vehicle wanted in connection with the homicide (the 46th this year in the city of St. Louis). The car is a newer model, dark green, four-door Audi A-6 with heavily tinted windows and with a U.S. government license plate #G122335K.

    Police say it was stolen from St. Louis city.

    An unknown black male exited the vehicle with a white bandana concealing his face — and opened fire with a black assault rifle, hitting Clark multiple times. He died at a hospital a short while later.

    Anyone with information is urged to asked to call CrimeStoppers at 866-371-TIPS (8477).

    Here are the photos of the suspect vehicle followed by our original post on the deadly shooting.

     

    Cops: Anthony Clark Killed By Masked Suspect With Assault Rifle In Broad Daylight (UPDATE)

    All courtesy of SLMPD

     

    Cops: Anthony Clark Killed By Masked Suspect With Assault Rifle In Broad Daylight (UPDATE)

     

    Cops: Anthony Clark Killed By Masked Suspect With Assault Rifle In Broad Daylight (UPDATE)

     

    Cops: Anthony Clark Killed By Masked Suspect With Assault Rifle In Broad Daylight (UPDATE)

    Original post: Wednesday, June 26, 8 a.m.: Around 11:30 a.m. yesterday, a masked gunman in St. Louis approached a vehicle and fired shots from a rifle at a man sitting in the passenger seat.

    The victim, whom police identified as 28-year-old Anthony Clark, was hit multiple times and taken to the hospital where he was pronounced dead less than two hours later.

    Meanwhile, the suspect remains unknown and at large after fleeing from the murder scene in a blue Audi A6.

    The shooting happened on the block where Clark lived, police say.

    The incident took place at the 5000 block of Cote Brilliante Avenue in the Ville neighborhood in north St. Louis.

    Officials are urging anyone with information about this incident to call CrimeStoppers at 866-371-TIPS.

    Cops have no further details about the shooter other than the fact that he was masked and fled after firing bullets into the car.

     

    Cops: Anthony Clark Killed By Masked Suspect With Assault Rifle In Broad Daylight (UPDATE)

    via Google Maps

    Clark is the 46th homicide victim in the city of St. Louis in 2013.

    Here’s the full incident report from SLMPD.

    Incident: Homicide
    Location: 5000 block of Cote Brilliante
    Date/Time: 06/25/13 @ 11:25 -11:30
    Victim: Anthony Clark, 28-year old black male of the 5000 block of Cote Brilliante
    Suspect: Unknown
    The victim was shot as he sat in the passenger seat of a vehicle in the 5000 block of Cote Brilliante. A masked gunman approached the vehicle and shot the victim multiple times with a rifle. The gunman fled the scene in a blue Audi A6. The victim was transported to an area hospital where he was listed in critical/unstable condition and later pronounced deceased. The investigation is ongoing.

    Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

  • Homicide No. 31: Terrance Morgan, 41, Shot Several Times in Head, Found in Alley, Cops Say

    Homicide No. 31: Terrance Morgan, 41, Shot Several Times in Head, Found in Alley, Cops Say

    Terrance Morgan, 41, is the 31st homicide victim in the city of St. Louis in 2013.Morgan, who lived on Stoddard Street in the Jeff-Vander-Lou neighborhood of north St. Louis, was found on the ground in a rear alley at around 5 p.m. yesterday, police say.

    Witnesses told police that they heard gunshots and then observed a black man fleeing the scene in a vehicle.

    So far, police have few details in the shooting and are searching for a suspect.

    The shooting took place on the 2500 block of Ohio Avenue.

     

    Homicide No. 31: Terrance Morgan, 41, Shot Several Times in Head, Found in Alley, Cops Say

    Police say that the victim was found with several gunshot wounds to the head and was pronounced dead on the scene soon after.

    Here’s the full alert from SLMPD.

    Incident: Homicide
    Location: 2500 block of Ohio
    Dates/Times: 5/2/13 @ 16:53
    Victim(s): Terrance Morgan, 41-year old black male of the 2800 block of Stoddard
    Suspect(s): unknown black male
    Officer responded to several calls for “shots fired” and responded to the rear alley of the above address and located the victim on the ground with several gunshot wounds to his head. The victim was pronounced deceased on the scene a short time after. Upon investigation, witnesses reported hearing several gunshots then observing a black male fleeing the scene in a vehicle. The investigation is ongoing.

    See also:
    Homicide No. 29: Julius Caldwell, 34, Found Lifeless in Car, Shot Multiple Times
    Glenda Jackson: Men Rob Victims, Kill Woman as She Tries to Retrieve Property
    Terence Anderson Allegedly Kills Girlfriend, Shoots Her Daughter, Then is Killed

    Send feedback and tips to the author. Follow Sam Levin on Twitter at @SamTLevin.

  • UPS KILLED MY DOG: Bizarre Sign Pops Up in North County [UPDATE]

    UPS KILLED MY DOG: Bizarre Sign Pops Up in North County [UPDATE]

    Update: A reader alerts us that we weren’t the only ones who saw the sign. And it opened up their mind.

    Sometimes, stories are difficult to unearth and require insider sources and knowledge. Other times, they present themselves in screaming red and yellow letters on somebody’s front lawn.

    Daily RFT was taking a jaunt through north county when, just on the outskirts of University City, we happened upon the sign you see in the picture at right. It was strung up on a clothesline with letters as large as five feet tall: “UPS KILLED MY DOG.”

    What else could we do but pull over and attempt to learn more?

    First of all, let’s see that upclose:

    Now here’s a person to give a sense of scale:

    [image-3]

    We attempted to knock on the front door of the house, but were held back by a chained gate and a “NO TRESSPASSING” sign. After hearing movement and barking dogs inside, we yelled, “HELLO. WE UNDERSTAND UPS KILLED YOUR DOG.”

    No dice.

    We left a note and a business card, and vowed not to give up.

    We contacted all the surrounding police precincts to ask if there’d been any calls for service in regard to a homicidal UPS truck — a spokesperson for St. Louis County Police says there’s been no calls from that address in recent history. We even called UPS corporate headquarters. Surely, they must track incidents of canineicide…right?

    “I have no idea what’s going on with this one,” confessed Dan McMackin, a spokesperson for UPS out of Atlanta.

    But he was able to sketch out UPS’ general response to unfortunate incidents of premature doggy deaths.

    “If they’re off the leash, then that’s basically considered the fault of the owner,” McMackin explained, whereas if the dog was killed on its owner’s property, “we tend to have some sort of settlement with the dog owner. It’s obviously a very unfortunate thing, and very often dogs aren’t seen…they run under tires.”

    McMackin vowed to make some calls and get back to us once he knew more. We’ve yet to hear back.

    Which leaves us with maddeningly little information other than that which was presented on the gigantic sign, which — at last check — is still up. There was once a dog. He was killed.

    If anyone out there knows more, please throw us a bone.

    Update: The ever-helpful @stljv had this to share:

    While we found a reporter’s conundrum in the screaming sign, others were able to find higher meaning. Here’s an excerpt from Deborah C. Davis at the New Northside Missionary Baptist Church:

    A relative and I were on our way to Wednesday night Bible study when we saw a most-surprising sight in a yard on a main thoroughfare. The resident(s) of the home had placed giant black lettering over different colored background on material over 6 feet tall in the yard. The highlighted message, “UPS KILLED MY DOG”, made me wonder why the resident(s) had taken their grief to this excessive level. They were surely suffering and could not figure out another way to voice their grief. I questioned whether the dog had a soul and would be able to meet its resident in heaven?

    Click here to read Ms. Davis’ conclusion on the fate of our mystery dog’s soul.

    Follow Jessica Lussenhop on Twitter at @Lussenpop. E-mail the author at [email protected].

  • Slyman v. Slyman: Appliance Store Family Sues Each Other Over Trademark

    Slyman v. Slyman: Appliance Store Family Sues Each Other Over Trademark

    Company founders Bob and Harry Slyman in an early TV ad.

    Updated with comment from Tony Slyman of Appliance Discounters.

    Slyman. The name has been synonymous with household appliances in St. Louis ever since brothers Bob and Harry Slyman aired a commercial of themselves seated on top of the Gateway Arch.

    “Thanks for making us tops in town,” the jovial brothers crowed in the 1972 advertisement that took liberal use of the then cutting-edge, green-screen technology.

    Four decades later the Slyman Brothers appliance stores continue to operate with three St. Louis locations, though the family-owned business recently got some unexpected competition from within its own clan.

    In a lawsuit filed this year in St. Louis Circuit Court, Slyman Brothers alleges that the local chain Appliance Discounters is infringing on its trademark by using the name Slyman in advertisements and store signage.

    Appliance Discounters opened in 2009 and, according to its website, now has locations in Webster Groves, St. Charles, Ballwin and Arnold. Its owners are Anthony Slyman and his sister, Denise Bradley. Both are children of Slyman Brothers’ founder, Bob Slyman, and worked for the family business prior to venturing out on their own.

    In the lawsuit, Slyman Brothers accuses Appliance Discounters of affiliating itself with “Slyman Brothers” in radio advertisements and its website and using the name Slyman in other marketing.

    Per the petition: “Plaintiffs receive regular and repeated contacts from the relevant purchasing public depicting the confusion created by the references and uses defendant has made of the Slyman trademarks, directly inquiring into the affiliation or relationship between Slyman Brothers and Appliance Discounters, believing that Slyman Brothers has opened a new ‘discount’ store.”

    The suit seeks a permanent injunction that would prohibit Appliance Discounters from advertising, associating or referencing the term Slyman or Slyman Brothers.

    In a statement e-mailed to Daily RFT, the plaintiffs state:

    “Slyman Brothers has been in business for more than 45 years, and we have worked very hard to establish our business name, our reputation, and our client base. Our family has made many sacrifices to get to where we are now. We only want to protect our clients and our business. The name “Slyman” is associated with great appliances, great customer service, and Slyman Brothers Appliances. We are proud of our business, and do not want our customers to be confused any longer about who they are buying appliances from.”

    Appliance Discounters declined comment to Daily RFT and has yet to respond in court to the initial complaint. However, it appears the company has removed mention of Slyman Brothers from its website, as mentioned in the lawsuit.

    Update: Tony Slyman reached out to Riverfront Times a few days after this article was published to clear up what he thought was a confusing headline and to tell his side of the story. Below is his response in its entirety:

    For the record, Appliance Discounters is not suing Slyman Brothers as reported earlier in the RFT nor has any intention of doing so. We find it shameful and embarrassing that any brother and sister would do so to one another. In reference to the so-called trademark infringements Slyman Brothers is referring to, it is me Tony Slyman using my personal name in ads and on the front door of my business. We have never used Slyman Brothers in any ads. We also post my sister’s name, Denise Bradley, proudly in our ads and on our front door. Denise and I both feel blessed that our business has grown from two to thirty employees and is the fastest growing independent appliance retailer in the Midwest. We once stated in our bio on our website that we once co-owned Slyman Brothers which is true. It was removed long before the lawsuit when we changed our website. We feel there is plenty of business in St. Louis for all to prosper and are happy for their success. We only wish they felt the same for us. After speaking with our parents, Robert and Jerry Slyman who are the original owners of Slyman Brothers, they are adamantly against this baseless lawsuit and are upset that it has made its way to the media. It also states on Slyman Brothers website that my brothers and sister bought Slyman Brothers from our father. The fact is it was given to all five of us that were involved in the family business. My sister Denise and I gave back our stock at no cost when we broke off to go our own way.
    Respectfully,
    Tony Slyman

    Continue on to view television ads from Appliance Discounter (mentioning the owners’ names) as well as some classic Slyman Brothers’ commercials.